Saipem Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2017] FWCA 300

17 JANUARY 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2017] FWCA 300
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Saipem Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2016/8075)

SAIPEM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND AUSTRALIAN WORKER’S UNION GLNG GAS PIPELINE GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2011

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 17 JANUARY 2017

Application for termination of the Saipem Australia Pty Ltd and Australian Worker’s Union GLNG Gas Pipeline Greenfields Agreement 2011.

[1] This decision concerns an application made by Saipem Australia Pty Ltd (the applicant) for the termination of the Saipem Australia Pty Ltd and Australian Worker’s Union GLNG Gas Pipeline Greenfields Agreement 2011.

[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

    226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

        (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

[5] The applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Julie Mason (Ms Mason) who is the Industrial Relations Manager of the applicant.

[6] Ms Mason explains that the Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 18 November 2015 and that the applicant no longer employs any person covered under the Agreement as the scope of work covered by the Agreement has been completed.

[7] The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) was invited to provide their view on the application but have not sought to make a submission

[8] The applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

[9] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[10] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the AWU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[11] Accordingly, the Saipem Australia Pty Ltd and Australian Worker’s Union GLNG Gas Pipeline Greenfields Agreement 2011 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE890013  PR589407>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0