Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 6814


[2013] FWCA 6814

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2703)

SAGE FABRICATIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 10 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 17 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE403931  PR541598>

Details
AGLC
Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6814
Case
[2013] FWCA 6814
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd was the subject of an application for approval of an enterprise agreement between the company and its employees. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The crux of the dispute lay in the interpretation and validity of certain clauses within the proposed agreement, particularly those concerning the classification of employees, their entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The legal issues before the commission involved scrutinising whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. Key points of contention included whether the classification of employees as per the agreement was fair and accurate, and whether the dispute resolution mechanisms were in line with the prescribed standards. The commission also had to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being deemed a "contemporary" and "independent" agreement as required by the legislation.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the submissions from both parties and the broader implications of the proposed agreement. It assessed the fairness of the classification and entitlements based on the evidence presented, ensuring that the agreement did not unjustifiably disadvantage any party. The commission also evaluated the dispute resolution processes to ensure they were accessible and effective. Ultimately, the commission found that the proposed agreement met the necessary legislative requirements and approved it, noting that it was a fair and balanced arrangement that appropriately reflected the needs of both the employer and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.