[2013] FWCA 6814 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2703)
SAGE FABRICATIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 10 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 17 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE403931 PR541598>
- AGLC
- Sage Fabrications Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6814
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6814
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the commission involved scrutinising whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. Key points of contention included whether the classification of employees as per the agreement was fair and accurate, and whether the dispute resolution mechanisms were in line with the prescribed standards. The commission also had to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being deemed a "contemporary" and "independent" agreement as required by the legislation.
In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the submissions from both parties and the broader implications of the proposed agreement. It assessed the fairness of the classification and entitlements based on the evidence presented, ensuring that the agreement did not unjustifiably disadvantage any party. The commission also evaluated the dispute resolution processes to ensure they were accessible and effective. Ultimately, the commission found that the proposed agreement met the necessary legislative requirements and approved it, noting that it was a fair and balanced arrangement that appropriately reflected the needs of both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.