| [2019] FWCA 4089 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Safran Helicopter Engines Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2019/505)
SAFRAN HELICOPTER ENGINES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (WORKSHOP) 2019
Airline operations | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 14 JUNE 2019 |
Application for approval of the Safran Helicopter Engines Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Workshop) 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Safran Helicopter Engines Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Workshop) 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Safran Helicopter Engines Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Fair Work Commission (FWC) received correspondence dated 5 June 2019, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Human Resources Director, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings). A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A.
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 June 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 June 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503890 PR709299>
- AGLC
- Safran Helicopter Engines Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 4089
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4089
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions of employment, and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. Additionally, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was free from any discriminatory provisions. Safran Helicopter Engines argued that the agreement was fair and necessary to maintain competitiveness, while the union contended that certain provisions adversely affected employee rights and conditions.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement contained provisions that were not fair and did not adequately protect employees' rights. Specifically, the agreement's provisions on casual loading and penalty rates were deemed insufficient. The Commission also noted issues with the agreement's handling of employee entitlements and the lack of provisions for adequate consultation. Consequently, the Commission did not approve the agreement.
The Commission ordered that the agreement be returned to the parties for further negotiation, with specific directives to address the identified deficiencies. The parties were instructed to consult and negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement that met the statutory requirements for fairness and protection of employee rights.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.