SafeWork NSW v Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 551
Hearing dates: 6 October 2021
Date of orders: 15 October 2021
Decision date: 15 October 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Strathdee DCJ
Decision:

(1)   The defendant is convicted.

(2)   The appropriate fine is $300,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea.

(3)   Accordingly, I order the defendant pay a fine of $225,000.00.

(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) the defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $20,000.00.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury

SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – capacity to pay –appropriate sentence

OTHER – s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)

Fines Act 1996 (NSW)

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Bulga Underground Operations v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338

Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (2000) 49 NSWLR 610

Environmental Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246

Fisher v Samaras Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 82 IR 384

Inspector Beacham v J & L Marble Pty Ltd [2009] NSWIRComm 100

Jahandideh v R [2014] NSWCCA 178

Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531

Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (1999) 90 IR 464

Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357

McColl v John Watson Building Services Pty Ltd (2004) 137 IR 310

Morrison v Powercoal Pty Ltd (No. 3) (2005) 147 IR 117

Orbit Drilling v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399

R v Cage [2006] NSWCCA 304

R v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92

R v Miria [2009] NSWCCA 68

R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272

R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383

SafeWork NSW v Grandcity Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 398

SafeWork NSW v HCM Building Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 632

SafeWork NSW v Poletti Corporation [2019] NSWDC 491

Veen v R (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465

WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Profab Industries Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 700

WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Sarjame Storage Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 151

Texts Cited:

Australian Glass & Glazing Association Safety Fact Sheet

Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd (Defendant)
Representation:

Mr M Scott of counsel (for the Prosecutor)
Mr P Barry of counsel (for the Defendant)

Solicitors: Mr A El-Roubaei, Department of Customer Service (for the Prosecutor)
Ms Amanda Harvey, Heathfield Grosvenor Lawyers (for the Defendant)
File Number(s): 2020/32188

JUDGMENT

  1. On 26 April 2021, Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd (‘the defendant’) entered a…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWDC 551
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SafeWork NSW brought proceedings against Silver Stone Hardware Pty Ltd, alleging breaches of work health and safety laws under section 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The dispute centred around the defendant's failure to ensure the safety of its employees, resulting in an incident that posed a significant risk of death or serious injury. The case was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales.

The court had to determine the appropriate penalty for the defendant's breaches of work health and safety regulations. The issues included assessing the objective seriousness of the offence, identifying mitigating and aggravating factors, and determining the appropriate fine and other penalties. The defendant had pleaded guilty, which was considered a mitigating factor. However, the severity of the breach and the need for deterrence were also taken into account.

In deciding the penalty, the court considered the objective seriousness of the offence, which involved a significant risk to employees' lives. The early plea of guilty was a mitigating factor, leading to a 25% reduction in the fine. The court imposed a fine of $300,000, reduced to $225,000 due to the plea. Additionally, 50% of the fine was to be paid to the prosecutor, and the defendant was ordered to pay the prosecutor’s costs of $20,000. The sentence aimed to serve both general and specific deterrence, reflecting the gravity of the breach and the need to uphold work health and safety standards.

The court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of $225,000, with 50% of that amount payable to SafeWork NSW. The defendant was also required to pay the prosecutor’s costs of $20,000. The sentence was designed to reflect the seriousness of the offence, provide deterrence, and ensure compliance with work health and safety laws in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The defendant is convicted.

(2) The appropriate fine is $300,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea.

(3) Accordingly, I order the defendant pay a fine of $225,000.00.

(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) the defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $20,000.00.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.