District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Epic Machinery Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 398 Hearing dates: 11 August 2021 Date of orders: 13 August 2021 Decision date: 13 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Strathdee DCJ Decision: (1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The appropriate fine is $200,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea.
(3) Accordingly, I order the defendant pay a fine of $150,000.00.
(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(5) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) the defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $43,247.20.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury
SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – capacity to pay – totality of sentence - appropriate sentence
OTHER – s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
Fines Act 1996 (NSW)
Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338
Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (2000) 49 NSWLR 610
Environmental Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246
Fisher v Samaras Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 82 IR 384
Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531
Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (1999) 90 IR 464
Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357
Morrison v Powercoal Pty Ltd (No 3) (2005) 147 IR 117
Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96
Orbit Drilling v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399
R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
SafeWork NSW v Grandcity Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 398
SafeWork NSW v HCM Building Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 632
SafeWork NSW v Poletti Corporation [2019] NSWDC 491
Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Profab Industries Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 700
WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Sarjame Storage Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 151
Texts Cited: Australian Standard, AS 4024 (Series) Safety of Machinery
SafeWork NSW Code of Practice, Managing the risk of plant in the workplace (July 2014)
Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Epic Machinery Pty Ltd (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr M Moir, for the Prosecutor
Mr P Skinner, for the Defendant
Mr J Bell Department of Customer Service (for the Prosecutor)
Mr K Rodgers, Brock Partners (for the Defendant)
File Number(s): 2020/209185 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
On 3 May 2021, Epic Machinery Pty Ltd (‘Epic’) entered a plea of guilty in respect of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v Epic Machinery Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 398
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the company had breached its duty under section 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), and if so, the appropriate sentence. The company pleaded guilty to the charges, and the court considered factors such as the objective seriousness of the offence, mitigating and aggravating circumstances, the company’s capacity to pay, and the need for general and specific deterrence.
The court found the offences to be of high objective seriousness due to the death resulting from the breaches. It took into account the early guilty plea as a mitigating factor, reducing the fine by 25%. Despite the company’s significant financial capacity, the court imposed a fine of $150,000.00, with 50% of this amount payable to the prosecutor, and ordered the company to pay the prosecutor’s costs of $43,247.20. The sentence was deemed appropriate given the circumstances and the need to deter future breaches.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The appropriate fine is $200,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea.
(3) Accordingly, I order the defendant pay a fine of $150,000.00.
(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(5) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) the defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $43,247.20.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.