District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 674 Hearing dates: 4 November 2019 Date of orders: 18 November 2019 Decision date: 18 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: 1 Michael Douglas Herbert is convicted.
2 I impose a fine of $15,000.
3 I order pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
4 B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd is convicted.
5 I impose a fine of $90,000.
6 I order pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
7 The offenders are to pay the prosecutor’s costs as agreed in the sum of $31,250.Catchwords: CRIME – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employers – risk of serious injury – worker injured
SENTENCING – objective seriousness – deterrence – aggravation factors – mitigating factorsLegislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Work Health and Safety Act 2011Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37
R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1
R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412Category: Principal judgment Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd (Defendant)
Michael Herbert (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
N Read (Prosecutor)
L Doust (Defendants)
Legal, Government and Corporate Services, Department of Customer Service (Prosecutor)
DLA Piper Australia (Defendants)
File Number(s): 2018/277348 and 2018/277338 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
Introduction
-
B & J Benchtops Pty Limited (the company) has pleaded guilty to an offence that being a person conducting a business or undertaking who had a health and safety duty under section 19(1) of the Act, it failed to comply with that duty and thereby exposed Shen Tao Xiao to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to section 32 of the Act.
-
The maximum penalty is a fine of $1,500,000.
-
Michael Douglas Herbert (the defendant), has pleaded guilty to an offence that as a person who had a health and safety duty under section 27(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (the Act), he failed to comply with that duty and thereby exposed Mr Xiao to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to section 32 of the Act.
-
The maximum penalty is a fine of $300,000.
Facts
-
The parties presented an Agreed Statement of Facts which can be summarised as follows.
-
The company manufactured and installed bench tops and cabinetry and operated its business at 2 Arnott Place, Wetherill Park in the State of New South Wales.
-
As part of the manufacturing process, various timber and plastic materials were cut to size and off-cuts were collected in a scrap bin. The scrap bin measured 800 mm x 1200 mm and was 600 mm high. The scrap bin was fitted with four castor wheels on its…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] NSWDC 674
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence to determine if the accused parties failed in their duty to ensure the health and safety of workers. It considered whether the risk of serious injury was foreseeable and if adequate measures were taken to prevent such harm. The court also assessed the objective seriousness of the offences, taking into account the gravity of the breach and its impact on the worker. Aggravating factors such as the foreseeability of the risk and the potential for serious injury were weighed against mitigating factors including the company’s compliance history and cooperation with the investigation.
In its reasoning, the court found that the accused parties did indeed breach their duties under the work health and safety legislation, leading to the worker’s injury. The court considered the offences to be of significant objective seriousness due to the potential for serious harm. It imposed fines on both the company and the director, with a portion of the fines to be paid to the prosecutor as per the Fines Act 1996. Additionally, the court ordered the offenders to pay the prosecutor’s costs.
The final orders of the court were that Michael Douglas Herbert is convicted, and a fine of $15,000 is imposed, with half to be paid to the prosecutor. B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd is also convicted, and a fine of $90,000 is imposed, with half to be paid to the prosecutor. Both offenders are ordered to pay the prosecutor’s costs in the sum of $31,250.
Orders
Orders of the court
1 Michael Douglas Herbert is convicted.
2 I impose a fine of $15,000.
3 I order pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
4 B & J Benchtops Pty Ltd is convicted.
5 I impose a fine of $90,000.
6 I order pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
7 The offenders are to pay the prosecutor’s costs as agreed in the sum of $31,250.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.