SafeWork NSW v Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd

Case [2023] NSWDC 131


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 131
Hearing dates: 13 – 17; 20 – 22; 24 and 27 February 2023
Date of orders: 01 May 2023
Decision date: 01 May 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

1   The prosecution has not proven all of the elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt.

2   I will hear from the parties before making final orders.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employers – risk of death or serious injury – injury to workers

Legislation Cited:

Evidence Act 1995

Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000

Work Health and Safety Act 2011

Work Health and Safety Regulation 2013

Cases Cited:

Aubrey v R (2017) 260 CLR 305

Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v R (2012) 246 CLR 92

Bulga Underground Operations v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37

Carrington Slipways Pty Ltd v Callaghan (1985) 11 IR 467

Collins v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 209

Director of Public Prosecutions v JCS Fabrications Pty Ltd and JMAL Group Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 50

Director of Public Prosecutions v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676

Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd v Buckley (1952) 87 CLR 313

Genner Constructions Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2001] NSWIRComm 267

Inspector Ching v Bros Bins Systems Pty Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 197

Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531

Laing O’Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117

R v Board of Trustees of the Science Museum [1993] 1 WLR 1171

R v Commercial Industrial Construction Group Pty Ltd (2006) 14 VR 321

R v Nelson Group Services (Maintenance) Ltd [1998] 4 All ER 332

R v Nelson Group Services (Maintenance) Ltd [1998] 4 All ER 332

Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378

Simpson Design and Associates Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 316

Slivak v Lurgi (Aust) Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 304

Smith v Broken Hill Pty Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 337

Tangerine Confectionery Ltd and Veolia ES (UK) Ltd v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2015

Thiess Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 78 NSWLR 94

WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kellogg (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 453

WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd (2004) 135 IR 166

WorkCover Authority of NSW v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (1998) 82 IR 80

Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Crown)
Astute Earth Works (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Cahill (Crown)
M Sahade (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Legal, Department of Customer Service (Crown)
Paramount Law Group (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2021/234801
2021/234811
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

Introduction

  1. Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd (Astute or the defendant) has pleaded not guilty to the following charges, the first two of which are brought in the alternative:

  1. an offence contrary to…

Continue reading SafeWork NSW v Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
SafeWork NSW v Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 131
Case
[2023] NSWDC 131
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SafeWork NSW prosecuted Astute Earth Works Pty Ltd for breaches of work health and safety laws under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The dispute arose from incidents at a construction site where workers were injured. The case was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales.

The legal issues for the court to decide included whether the company breached its duty of care under the work health and safety laws. Specifically, the court needed to determine if Astute Earth Works failed to ensure the health and safety of workers by not managing the risks of injury properly. This involved assessing whether the company took reasonable steps to identify and mitigate the risks of workers being exposed to dangerous machinery and materials.

The court found that while there were breaches of work health and safety regulations, the prosecution had not proven beyond reasonable doubt that these breaches led to the workers' injuries. The evidence presented was not sufficient to establish the direct causal link between the breaches and the injuries. Therefore, the court acquitted the company of the charges, as the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof. The court will hear further submissions from the parties before making any final orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 The prosecution has not proven all of the elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt.

2 I will hear from the parties before making final orders.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.