SafeWork NSW v 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

Industrial Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd [2025] NSWIC 5
Hearing dates: 29 May 2025
Date of orders: 02 July 2025
Decision date: 02 July 2025
Before: Taylor J, President
Decision:

(1)   I impose a fine on 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd of $180,000.

(2)   465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd is to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings in the amount of $42,762.77 as agreed.

(3) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW — Work health and safety — Offences — Category 2 — Sentencing — Gate overrunning its supports and falling — No adequate end stop — Faulty design and installation of gate — Low to mid-range of objective seriousness

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 22, 23, 30E

Fines Act 1996 (NSW), s 122

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), ss 20, 32

Cases Cited:

Inspector Lancaster v M L Colturi Sawmills Pty Ltd [2011] NSWIRComm 47

Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96

R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102

R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243

R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309

R v XX (2017) 266 A Crim R 132; [2017] NSWCCA 90

R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412

SafeWork NSW v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDC 313

SafeWork NSW v Chris Darby Strata Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 360

SafeWork NSW v Hibernian Contracting Pty Ltd [2025] NSWIC 4

SafeWork NSW v Maluko Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 274

SafeWork NSW v The Owners – Strata Plan No 93899 [2024] NSWDC 277

Texts Cited:

Australian Standard AS 2601-2001 “The Demolition of Structures”

SafeWork NSW, “Code of Practice: Demolition Work” (August 2019)

SafeWork NSW, “Code of Practice: Managing the Work Environment and Facilities” (August 2019)

SafeWork NSW, “Industrial gate fatality – 12 June 2020” (Incident information release, 27 August 2020)

WorkSafe Western Australia, Safety Alert 08/2018 (August 2018)

Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Moir (Prosecutor)
B Clark (Defendant)

Solicitors:
SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
File Number(s): 2024/320298
Publication restriction: Pursuant to the order of Taylor J, President made on 29 May 2025 and s 164A of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), there is to be no publication of the names and other identifying details of the four victims in these proceedings.

JUDGMENT

  1. On 2 September 2022 a woman and her three young children were walking home along a footpath on Parramatta Road, Leichardt when a 200-kilogram sliding gate (Gate) was opened, overran its supports and fell onto them, causing them to be injured.

  2. SafeWork NSW as the prosecutor instituted proceedings against the company that had arranged for the Gate to be installed, 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd, the defendant in these proceedings. The defendant subsequently entered a plea of guilty to a Category 2…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWIC 5
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In SafeWork NSW v 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd, the plaintiff, SafeWork NSW, brought proceedings against the defendant, 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd, following an incident in which a gate overran its supports and fell, causing harm. The dispute pertained to breaches of work health and safety laws, specifically in relation to the design and installation of the gate. The case was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the defendant had contravened specific work health and safety regulations, and if so, what appropriate penalty should be imposed. The court had to consider the objective seriousness of the contravention, the circumstances leading to the incident, and any mitigating factors. The primary focus was on whether the fault lay with the design and installation of the gate, which lacked an adequate end stop.

In its reasoning, the court found that the gate's faulty design and installation directly contributed to the incident, leading to a contravention of the relevant work health and safety regulations. The court assessed the objective seriousness of the offence, determining it to be in the low to mid-range. The court took into account the absence of an adequate end stop as a critical factor in the incident. The fine imposed reflected the seriousness of the breach, while also considering the financial capacity of the defendant and the need for deterrence. The court ordered that 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd pay a fine of $180,000, along with the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings. Additionally, 50% of the fine was to be paid to the prosecutor, as mandated by section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW).

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) I impose a fine on 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd of $180,000.

(2) 465 Leichhardt Pty Ltd is to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings in the amount of $42,762.77 as agreed.

(3) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.