Sae-Lao, Ruangdet (Migration)

Sae-Lao, Ruangdet (Migration) [2023] AATA 3942 (19 September 2023)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT:  Sae-Lao, Ruangdet
REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Antony Amhurst Wallace (MARN: 0965140)
CASE NUMBER:  2006570
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/493470
MEMBER:C. Packer
DATE:19 September 2023
PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal sets aside the decision not to approve the nomination and substitutes a decision that the nomination is approved.

Statement made on 19 September 2023 at 5.40pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination – approval of nominated position – Short-term stream – Cafe or Restaurant Manager – genuine position – financial capacity – decision under review set aside
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 140GB, 140GBA
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.72, 2.73
CASES
Cargo First Pty Ltd v MIBP [2016] FCA 30

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 17 March 2020 to refuse to approve the applicant’s nomination under s 140GB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) and reg 2.72 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).
The applicant applied for approval on 19 February 2020. A nomination of an occupation for a Subclass 482 visa is made under s 140GB of the Act and reg 2.73 of the Regulations. The occupation must be nominated for a Subclass 482 visa in one of three alternative streams: the Short-term stream, the Medium-term stream or the Labour Agreement stream. Regulation 2.72 prescribes general and stream-specific criteria that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve a nomination by a person. These criteria are extracted in the attachment to this decision. Additional criteria are specified in s 140GBA. In this case, the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 visa in the Short-term stream.
The delegate decided not to approve the nomination on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy reg 2.72(10) because the delegate considered that the position in the nominated occupation of Cafe or Restaurant Manager 141111 cannot be supported within the Sponsored business operation.
The applicant was represented in relation to the review.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to set aside the decision under review and substitute a decision approving the nomination.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets the criteria for approval of the nomination. The Tribunal must approve the nomination if the applicant is an approved work sponsor and meets the requirements in reg 2.72: s 140GB(2). The applicant must also have paid any nomination training contribution charge in relation to the nomination for which they are liable. In addition, the labour market testing requirements in s 140GBA must be met.
The nomination must comply with the prescribed process
Regulation 2.72(3) requires that the applicant has made the nomination in accordance with the process set out in reg 2.73.
The Tribunal finds:
·The applicant is nominating an occupation under s 140GB(1)(b) in relation to a proposed applicant for a Subclass 482 visa: reg 2.73(1);
·The nomination was made using the approved form and fee: regs 2.73(3), (4) and (5);
·The nomination was accompanied by any applicable nomination training contribution charge: reg 2.73(5A);
·The nomination is in the short-term stream as the occupation is a short-term strategic skills specified occupation: reg 2.73(6);
·The applicant has identified the nominee Panupong Kraikaew, in the nomination: reg 2.73(8);
·The nomination includes the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6 digit code Cafe or Restaurant Manager - 141111, the location/s at which the occupation will be carried out, the proposed period of stay for a visa granted on the basis of the nomination (2 years), the annual turnover for the nomination: reg 2.73(9);
·The nomination includes written certification as to whether or not the person has engaged in conduct that contravenes s 245AR(1) of the Act: reg 2.73(12);
·The nomination includes written certification that the employment contract with the nominee complies or will comply with Commonwealth, State or Territory employment laws: reg 2.73(13);
·The nomination includes written certification that the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks specified for the occupation in ANZSCO; that the qualifications and experience of the nominee are commensurate with those specified for the occupation in ANZSCO; and that the position is in the person’s business: reg 2.73(14).
For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(3) are met.
No adverse information known to Immigration
Regulation 2.72(4) requires that either: there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant or a person associated with the applicant; or it is reasonable to disregard such information. For these purposes, ‘adverse information’ and ‘associated with’ have the meaning given in regs 1.13A and 1.13B.
Departmental systems show that there is no adverse information known to Immigration. The Tribunal is satisfied there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant or a person associated with the applicant, within the terms of regs 1.13A and 1.13B. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(4) are met.
Nominator is a standard business sponsor
Regulation 2.72(5) requires that the person making a nomination is a standard business sponsor. Departmental systems that show a Standard Business Sponsorship agreement was approved on 24 May 2019 to 24 May 2024. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(5) are met.
Payment of debt mentioned in s 140ZO
Regulation 2.72(5A) requires that the person has paid in full any debt mentioned in s 140ZO of the Act. There is no information before the Tribunal that shows the applicant owes a debt mentioned in s 140ZO. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(5A) are met.
Requirements for existing Subclass 457 or Subclass 482 visa holders
The criteria for approval of a nomination contain several requirements if a Subclass 457 or Subclass 482 visa holder is identified as the person to work in the nominated position. As the nominee was not the holder of a Subclass 457 or Subclass 482 visa, the requirements of reg 2.72(6) and reg 2.72(14) do not apply.
Specified occupation
Regulation 2.72(8) requires that the nominated occupation and its 6-digit code correspond to an occupation and 6-digit code specified in the instrument in force at the time the nomination is made, that is, IMMI 19/048. The occupation must also apply to the nominee in accordance with the instrument. The nominated occupation concerns a Cafe or Restaurant Manager 141111. This corresponds to an occupation and 6-digit code specified in the instrument in the short-term stream. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(8) are met.
Position must be genuine and full-time
Regulation 2.72(10)(a) requires that the position associated with the nominated occupation is genuine. A similar requirement was considered in Cargo First Pty Ltd v MIBP [2016] FCA 30, where the Court (at [34]) upheld the Tribunal’s approach of qualitatively assessing the position and comparing this with the occupation nominated in order to determine whether it was genuine. In addition, reg 2.72(10)(b) requires the position to be a full-time position, unless it is reasonable to disregard this requirement.
The applicant provided a large volume of documents and information, including:
·Financial statements 2022 and 2021
·BAS statements 2021 to 2023
·Detailed organisation chart evidencing how the role fits within the scope and scale of the business
·Photos of the restaurant
·Menus, reviews
·The nomination approved on 14 March 2023
·The nominee’s visa approved on 29 June 2023
Departmental systems show that on 14 March 2023 Sae-Lao, Ruangdet had an approved nomination in the Temporary Skill Shortage (subclass 482) visa program, short-term stream. The approved nomination concerned the same nominee Panupong Kraikaew in the same occupation of Cafe or Restaurant Manager – 141111.
Departmental systems show that on 29 June 2023 the same nominee was granted a Temporary Skill Shortage (subclass 482) for the nominated occupation of Cafe or Restaurant Manager – 141111.
Based on the material before it, the Tribunal finds that the nominated occupation is genuine, and the associated position is full-time. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(10) are met.
Employment under contract
Regulations 2.72(11) and (12) require that the nominee will be engaged only as an employee under a written contract of employment and that the applicant will give a copy of the contract, signed by the employer and nominee, to the Minister.
A contract of employment dated 6/11/2019 for the nominee was provided in the application. The nominee has subsequently been granted a 482 visa to work in the nominated occupation and position. The Tribunal is satisfied the nominee would be engaged as an employee under a written contract of employment by the applicant. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(11) are met.
Annual earnings
Regulation 2.72(15) contains several requirements which must be met if the nominee’s annual earnings in relation to the nominated occupation will not be at least the amount specified in the instrument IMMI 18/033. Regulation 2.57A provides for the meaning of ‘earnings’. Where reg 2.72(15) applies, it requires that:
·the annual market salary rate (the rate) for the occupation has been determined by the applicant by reference to instrument IMMI 18/033: reg 2.72(15)(c). The ‘annual market salary rate’ means the earnings an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident earns or would earn for performing equivalent work on a full-time basis for a year in the same workplace at the same location: reg 1.03.
·the rate, excluding any non-monetary benefits (as defined in reg 2.57A(3)), for the occupation is not less than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified in the instrument IMMI 18/033 (TSMIT), unless the rate for the occupation is not less than the TSMIT, and it is reasonable in the circumstances to disregard this criterion: reg 2.72(15)(d) and reg 2.72(16)(a);
·the nominee’s annual earnings in relation to the occupation will not be less than the rate for the occupation, unless it is reasonable in the circumstances to disregard this criterion, and the criterion in reg 2.72(10)(b) in relation to the need for a full-time position is disregarded under reg 2.72(10A): reg 2.72(15)(e) and reg 2.72(16)(aa);
·the nominee’s annual earnings, excluding any non-monetary benefits (as defined in reg 2.57A(3)), in relation to the occupation will not be less than the TSMIT, unless it is reasonable in the circumstances to disregard this criterion: reg 2.72(15)(f) and reg 2.72(16)(b); and
·either there is no information known to Immigration that indicates the rate for the occupation is inconsistent with Australian labour market conditions relevant to the occupation, or it is reasonable to disregard any such information: reg 2.72(15)(g).
As the annual earnings in relation to the occupation will not be at least the specified amount, the requirements of reg 2.72(15) must be met.
In the application the applicant sought to nominate the nominee on a wage of $54,000.
In the review the applicant states the salary would be $65,000.
The applicant’s submission states in part:
7.1 While there is another restaurant manager working within the business, they are employed
at a differed location to where the nominee will be employed. These locations are
differentiated in the attached staff list. As such, there is no equivalent Australian worker in
the same position, at the same location as the nominee. Therefore, market salary data has
derived from numerous sources;
1. Talent.com salary survey showing a salary range for a Restaurant Manager in
Australia, between $57,500 p.a. to $77,500 p.a., with a median salary of $65,000 p.a.
2. Payscale salary survey showing a salary range for a Restaurant Manager in Melbourne,
between $50,000 p.a. to $72,000 p.a.
3. An advertisement from Workforce Australia showing a salary range for a Restaurant
Manager in Melbourne, Victoria, between $60,000 p.a. to $70,000 p.a.
4. An advertisement on Indeed showing a salary range for a Restaurant Manager in Point
Cook, Victoria, between $56,121 p.a. to $75,390 p.a.
5. An advertisement on Indeed showing a salary range for a Restaurant Manager in
Brighton, Victoria, between $55,000 p.a. to $70,000 p.a.
7.2 The information provided shows that $65,000 p.a. is a fair salary being offered to the nominee
based on his experience and the above-mentioned MSD. An entry-level position for an
incumbent with minimal experience would offer a salary at the lower end of the MSD range,
however as the nominee has experience within the industry, the nominated salary was chosen
from the mid-level range of the MSD. Upon further employment with the sponsoring entity,
salary increases toward the higher end of the MSD range can be expected.
The TSMIT was $53,900. The Tribunal accepts the applicant has determined the annual market salary rate for the nominated occupation in accordance with the relevant instrument. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(15)(c) are met.
The rate, excluding any non-monetary benefits, for the occupation is not less than the TSMIT. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(15)(d) are met.
The nominee’s annual earnings in relation to the occupation will not be less than the rate for the occupation. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(15)(e) are met.
The nominee’s annual earnings, excluding any non-monetary benefits, in relation to the occupation will not be less than the TSMIT. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(15)(f) are met.
There is no information before the Tribunal that indicates the annual market salary rate is inconsistent with Australian labour market conditions relevant to the occupation. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(15)(g) are met.
Employment conditions
Regulation 2.72(18)(a) requires that there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the employment conditions (other than in relation to earnings) that will apply to the nominee are less favourable than those that apply, or would apply, to an Australian citizen or permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location, unless it is reasonable to disregard any such information.
If the applicant is lawfully operating a business in Australia, they must also not have engaged in discriminatory recruitment practices: reg 2.72(18)(b). In this case, the applicant is lawfully operating a business in Australia and reg 2.72(18)(b) does apply.
Based on the material before the Tribunal, there is no information that indicates the nominee’s employment conditions (other than earnings) will be less favourable than those for the Australian equivalent. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(18)(a) are met.
Based on the material before the Tribunal, there is no information that indicates the applicant has engaged in any discriminatory recruitment practices. For these reasons the requirements of reg 2.72(18)(b) are met.
Labour Market Testing
Section 140GBA requires a person who nominates an occupation and associated position to fulfil the ‘labour market testing condition’ unless the major disaster or skill and occupational exemptions in ss 140GBB-140GBC apply, or it would be inconsistent with any international trade obligation of Australia determined by the Minister under s 140GBA(2).
For these purposes, labour market testing means testing of the Australian labour market to demonstrate whether a suitably qualified and experienced Australian citizen or permanent resident is readily available to fill the position. To satisfy the labour market testing condition, the testing must be undertaken within a prescribed period as set out in instrument IMMI 18/036.
The manner in which labour market testing in relation to the nominated position is to be conducted and the types of evidence that must accompany the nomination are set out in instrument IMMI 18/036.
The applicant’s submission states in part:
9.1 Pursuant to legislative instrument LIN 21/075, dated 28/10/2021, and cl. 140GBA(2) of the
Migration Act 1958, the business is exempt from the Labour Market Testing requirement as
the nominee is a citizen of Thailand.
9.2 However, despite the applicant being exempt from Labour Market Testing, the business
genuinely attempted to recruit an employee from the local labour market. The business
posted advertisements for the position on Workforce Australia, Indeed and Careerone,
however no suitable candidate from the local labour market was located through the
extensive search.
The Tribunal notes that Departmental systems show that on 14 March 2023 Sae-Lao, Ruangdet had an approved nomination in the Temporary Skill Shortage (subclass 482) visa program, short-term stream. The approved nomination concerned the same nominee Panupong Kraikaew in the same occupation of Cafe or Restaurant Manager – 141111.
Based on the material before it, the Tribunal is satisfied the labour market testing requirements in s 140GBA are met.
Nomination training contribution charge
Section 140ZM imposes a liability on a person to pay a nomination training contribution charge where the nomination is of a prescribed kind. Regulation 5.42 prescribes a nomination of a proposed occupation under s 140GB(1)(b) in relation to a Subclass 457 or Subclass 482 visa holder or an applicant or proposed applicant for a Subclass 482 visa. The nomination training contribution charge is a charge imposed by s 7 of the Migration (Skilling Australians Fund) Charges Act 2018 (Cth), and the amount of the charge is prescribed by the Migration (Skilling Australians Fund) Charges Regulations 2018 (Cth). Liability to pay the charge arises for nominations made on or after 12 August 2018. If the applicant is liable to pay the charge, it must have been paid: s 140GB(2)(aa). Departmental systems show the charge was paid. For these reasons the requirements of s 140GB(2)(aa) are met.
Conclusion
For the reasons given above, the applicant meets all the applicable criteria for the nomination to be approved.
DECISION
The Tribunal sets aside the decision not to approve the nomination and substitutes a decision that the nomination is approved.
C. Packer
Member

ATTACHMENT - EXTRACTS FROM THE MIGRATION REGULATIONS 1994
2.72 Criteria for approval of nomination--Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa and Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa
(1)This regulation applies in relation to a person who:
(a)is any of the following:
(i)       a standard business sponsor;
(ii)      a person who has applied to be a standard business sponsor;
(iii)     …
(iv)    …
(b)under paragraph 140GB(1)(b) of the Act, nominates a proposed occupation in relation to any of the following (the nominee):
(i)       a holder of a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa;
(ii)      a holder of a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa;
(iii)     an applicant or a proposed applicant for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa.
(2)For the purposes of paragraph 140GB(2)(b) of the Act, the criteria set out in this regulation are prescribed.
Note: In addition, subsection 140GB(2) of the Act requires the person to be an approved work sponsor and to have paid any nomination training contribution charge in relation to the nomination.
(3)The Minister is satisfied that the person made the nomination in accordance with the process set out in regulation 2.73.
(4)The Minister is satisfied that either:
(a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person or a person associated with the person; or
(b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person or a person associated with the person.
(5)The Minister is satisfied that:
(a)if the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream—the person is a standard business sponsor; or
(b)…
(5A)The Minister is satisfied that any debt due by the person as mentioned in section 140ZO of the Act (recovery of nomination training contribution charge and late payment penalty) has been paid in full.
(6)If the nominee holds:
(a)a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa; or
(b)a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa;
the Minister is satisfied that the person has listed on the nomination each other holder of either of those kinds of visa who was granted the visa on the basis of having the necessary relationship with the nominee as mentioned in clause 457.321 of Schedule 2 (as in force before 18 March 2018) or subclause 482.312(1) of Schedule 2.
(7)However, the Minister may disregard the fact that one or more persons required to be listed on the nomination are not listed, if the Minister is satisfied it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so.
(8)The Minister is satisfied that:
(a)the occupation and its corresponding 6-digit code correspond to an occupation and its corresponding 6-digit code specified in:
(i)       if the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream—the instrument made under subregulation (9) in force at the time the nomination is made; or
(ii)      …; and
(b)the occupation applies to the nominee in accordance with the instrument or work agreement.
(9)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify occupations and, for each occupation:
(a)whether the occupation is:
(i)       a short term skilled occupation; or
(ii)      a medium and long term strategic skills occupation; and
(b)either:
(i)       the 6-digit ANZSCO code for the occupation; or
(ii)      if there is no 6-digit ANZSCO code for the occupation—a 6-digit code for the occupation; and
(c)if there is no 6-digit ANZSCO code for the occupation—tasks, qualifications and experience for the occupation; and
(d)any matters for the purpose of determining whether the occupation applies to a nominee, including matters relating to any of the following:
(i)       the person who nominated the occupation;
(ii)      the nominee;
(iii)     the occupation;
(iv)    the position in which the nominee is to work;
(v)     the circumstances in which the occupation is undertaken;
(vi)    the circumstances in which the nominee is to be employed in the position.
(10)The Minister is satisfied that the position associated with the occupation is:
(a)genuine; and
(b)a full-time position.
(10A)However, the Minister may disregard the criterion in paragraph (10)(b) if the Minister is satisfied that it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so.
(11)If:
(a)the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream; and
(b)the person is not an overseas business sponsor; and
(c)the occupation is not an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument made under subregulation (13);
the Minister is satisfied that:
(d)the nominee will be engaged only as an employee under a written contract of employment by the person or an associated entity of the person (the employer); and
(e)the person will give the Minister a copy of the contract signed by the employer and the nominee.
(12)If:
(a)the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream; and
(b)the person is an overseas business sponsor; and
(c)the occupation is not an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument made under subregulation (13);
the Minister is satisfied that:
(d)the nominee will be engaged only as an employee under a written contract of employment by the person; and
(e)the person will give the Minister a copy of the contract signed by the person and the nominee.
(13)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify occupations for the purposes of paragraphs (11)(c) and (12)(c) …
(14)If:
(a)the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream; and
(b)the nominee holds a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa or a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa; and
(c)the Minister requested the person to provide evidence that the nominee satisfies the language test requirements;
the person has provided evidence to the Minister that the nominee satisfies:
(d)if the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream—any language test requirements specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument for clause 482.223 of Schedule 2 that would apply to the nominee if the nominee were an applicant for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream; or
(e)if the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium-term stream—any language test requirements specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument for clause 482.232 of Schedule 2 that would apply to the nominee if the nominee were an applicant for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium-term stream.
(15)Subject to subregulation (16), if:
(a)the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream; and
(b)the Minister is not satisfied that the nominee’s annual earnings in relation to the occupation will be at least the amount specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of this paragraph;
the Minister is satisfied that:
(c)the annual market salary rate for the occupation has been determined by the person in accordance with the instrument made under subregulation (17); and
(d)the annual market salary rate, excluding any non-monetary benefits, for the occupation (determined by the person in accordance with an instrument made under subregulation (17)) is not less than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of this paragraph; and
(e)the nominee’s annual earnings in relation to the occupation will not be less than the annual market salary rate for the occupation (determined by the person in accordance with an instrument made under subregulation (17)); and
(f)the nominee’s annual earnings, excluding any non-monetary benefits, in relation to the occupation will not be less than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of paragraph (d); and
(g)either:
(i)       there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the annual market salary rate for the occupation (determined by the person in accordance with an instrument made under subregulation (17)) is inconsistent with Australian labour market conditions relevant to the occupation; or
(ii)      it is reasonable to disregard any such information.
(16)However:
(a)the Minister may disregard the criterion in paragraph (15)(d) if the Minister is satisfied that:
(i)       the annual market salary rate for the occupation (determined by the person in accordance with an instrument made under subregulation (17)) is not less than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of paragraph (15)(d); and
(ii)      it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so; and
(aa)the Minister may disregard the criterion in paragraph (15)(e) if:
(i)       under subregulation (10A), the Minister disregards the criterion in paragraph (10)(b) in relation to the position associated with the occupation; and
(ii)      the Minister is satisfied that it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so; and
(b)the Minister may disregard the criterion in paragraph (15)(f) if the Minister is satisfied that it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so.
(17)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify a method for determining the annual market salary rate for an occupation nominated under section 140GB of the Act or an occupation in relation to which a position is nominated under regulation 5.19.
(18)If the occupation is nominated for a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short-term stream or Medium-term stream, the Minister is satisfied that:
(a)either:
(i)       there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the employment conditions (other than in relation to earnings) that will apply to the nominee are less favourable than those that apply, or would apply, to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location; or
(ii)      it is reasonable to disregard any such information; and
(b)if the person is lawfully operating a business in Australia—the person has not engaged in discriminatory recruitment practices.
(19)…

[2023] AATA 3942

19 September 2023

Key Legal Topics

Areas of Law

Immigration

Administrative Law

Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

Judicial Review

Procedural Fairness

Jurisdiction

Statutory Construction

Natural Justice

Appeal