Saddi (Migration)

[2020] AATA 5690

Saddi (Migration) [2020] AATA 5690 (28 September 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Puneet Saddi

CASE NUMBER:  1931658

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2019/4503400

MEMBER:D Triaca

DATE:28 September 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.

Statement made on 28 September 2020 at 10:51am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – subclass 500 (Student) visa­ – lower level of studies ­–genuine temporary entrant criterion not met– economic ties with Australia–– decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 359, 499
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.212

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 22 October 2019 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 9 September 2019. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.212 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

4. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 23 September 2020 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Punjabi and English languages.

5. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that decision under review should be affirmed.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

6. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria.

   Genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student (cl.500.212)

7. Clause 500.212 requires as follows:

   The applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because:

   (a)the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, having regard to:

   (i)the applicant’s circumstances; and

   (ii)the applicant’s immigration history; and

   (iii)if the applicant is a minor—the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and

   (iv)any other relevant matter; and

   (b)the applicant intends to comply with any conditions subject to which the visa is granted, having regard to:

   (i)the applicant’s record of compliance with any condition of a visa previously held by the applicant (if any); and

   (ii)the applicant’s stated intention to comply with any conditions to which the visa may be subject; and

   (c)of any other relevant matter.

   Does the applicant intend genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily?

8. In considering whether the applicant satisfies cl.500.212(a), the Tribunal must have regard to Direction No.69, ‘Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa and Student Guardian visa applications’, made under s.499 of the Act. This Direction, which is attached to this decision, requires the Tribunal to have regard to a number of specified factors in relation to:

   ·the applicant’s circumstances in their home country, potential circumstances in Australia, and the value of the course to the applicant’s future;

   ·the applicant’s immigration history, including previous applications for an Australian visa or for visas to other countries, and previous travel to Australia or other countries;

   ·if the applicant is a minor, the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and

   ·any other relevant information provided by the applicant, or information otherwise available to the decision maker, including information that may be either beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.

9. The Direction indicates that the factors specified should not be used as a checklist but rather, are intended only to guide decision makers when considering the applicant’s circumstances as a whole, in reaching a finding about whether the applicant satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion.

10. Whilst not defined in the Regulations, the word genuine may be taken to mean ‘authentic, real or true’ in according with its ordinary and natural meaning. The Regulations specify two constituent elements of a genuine student visa applicant. First, a genuine applicant is one who intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily. The applicant must demonstrate an intention to stay in Australia for a limited time only, not permanently. That intention must be unqualified. This requirement reflects the temporary nature of being a student.[1] Secondly, a ‘genuine applicant’ is a person who intends to comply with any conditions to which the visa may be subject.[2]

    [1] See Singh [2019] (Migration) AATA 2993 at [13]

    [2] See the discussion of the meaning of ‘genuine applicant’ in Vu Vu (Migration) [2019] AATA 5740 (18 December 2019) [22] – [25] and upheld on appeal in Vu Vu & Ors v Minister for Immigration and anor [2020] FCCA 2292

11. The issues in this case arose in the following circumstances, the applicant is a 29 year old citizen of India. He first arrived in Australia on 17 November 2015. He has lived in Australia since that time on a student visa, a temporary graduate visa and associated bridging visas. On 9 September 2019 the applicant applied for a further student visa proposing to study an Advanced Diploma of Leadership and Management. On 22 October 2019 a delegate of the Department refused his application (delegate’s decision). On 7 November 2019 he applied to the tribunal for a review of the delegates decision and he provided the tribunal with a copy of that decision.

12. The tribunal has read and had regard to documentation provided by the applicant to the Department and the tribunal including the delegates decision, passport, application for a student visa, bridging visa information. On 1 June 2020 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and invited him to provide further information in relation to his application pursuant to s.359(2) of the Act. On 15 June 2020 the applicant responded in writing (359 Response) and provided further documents in support including a GTE Statement, enrolment letter, Statement of Attainment from Vocational Training Institute. The Tribunal has read and had regard to these documents. On 15 September 2020 the applicant provided further documents to the Tribunal including his Confirmation of Enrolment, Certificate of Attainment ACS Professional Year Program 4 March 2019, Master of Information Systems Central Queensland University Certificate and Academic Transcript. The Tribunal has read and had regard to the further documents.

13. The applicant is currently enrolled in an Advanced Diploma of Leadership and Management at Vocational Training Institute. This course is due to be completed on 10 November 2020. By this application, the applicant is seeking to remain in Australia to enable him to complete the course.

14. The applicant’s background is as follows. After completing Secondary School in India, he enrolled in a Bachelor of Technology at Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering. He completed his course in June 2013. He worked for a period as a Senior Project Engineer and an E-Tutor content developer before arriving in Australia on 18 November 2015. Since that time he has completed a Graduate Certificate of Project Management and a Master of Information Systems at the Central Queensland University both completed in 2017. He then completed a Professional Year commencing in April 2018 and concluding in March 2019, having been granted a temporary graduate visa. He provided evidence of Certificate of Attainment confirming he completed the ACS Professional Year Program on 4 March 2019. In September 2019 he enrolled in an Advanced Diploma of Leadership and Management (current study).

15. The first question before the Tribunal is whether the current study offers any real value to the applicant’s future. The Tribunal considers it offers no value. The applicant’s plans for the future are vague and not well developed. This is evident from his GTE Statement in which the applicant listed numerous jobs he may apply for including ‘administration officer, senior development manager, ICT Consultant Team Leader, Customer Service Consultant, HR Executive, Recruitment Co-Ordinator and many more. I would like to work for the reputed and big companies in India or nearby companies.’  The Tribunal considers the breadth of the applicant’s possible future jobs indicates a lack of any real precision in his future plans. He appears uncertain what path he intends his career to take upon his return home. In his 359 Response he stated he intends to return to India and job in a ‘big firm.’ In his oral evidence he elaborated that he hoped to find a job as a supervisor or team leader in a corporate environment and get a good job in a company. The Tribunal does not consider that the applicant has demonstrated how further study in the proposed course is likely to assist him in finding suitable employment upon his return home. He holds a Bachelor and Masters Degrees and the Tribunal considers these qualifications alone ought to be sufficient for him to return home and commence his career in any of the possibilities he has proposed.

16. The Tribunal does not consider the current study is consistent with the applicant’s current level of education. Vocational studies are well below the level of the applicant’s university level qualifications.

17. In these circumstances, the Tribunal does not consider the proposed course is likely to assist the applicant to obtain employment or improve his employment prospects in his home country, or a third country. It follows that the Tribunal does not consider the proposed study is likely to increase the applicant’s remuneration in his home country.

18. The applicant says he prefers to study in Australia due to the practical and career orientated training offered so that students are confident about their skills and lead to better jobs. He states that Australian education offers innovative education and learning styles. The Tribunal does not consider the applicant has really considered studying this or a similar course in India. It is clear he would prefer to continue to study here, which is not surprising given he has studied here successfully since 2015. However, the Tribunal does not consider he has advanced reasonable reasons for not undertaking further study in India.

19. There is no evidence in relation to the applicant’s circumstances in her home country relative to others there.

20. The applicant states, and the Tribunal accepts that he has no concerns in relation to political or civil unrest in his home country.

21. The applicant states, and the Tribunal accepts, that he has no concerns in relation to military service commitments in his home country.

22. The applicant’s family is stated to be his parents and two sisters. One sister lives in Australia. His family otherwise live in India. He last saw his family in India in February 2018. He says he speaks to them regularly via video calls most days. He says he had an active social life in India and was involved in charity events. He spoke to an extended family and friends. He says he used to participate in religious programs and cultural events. The applicant has no dependents in India. He has returned home once for 5 weeks in 2018. Given that he has lived here for close to 5 years and appears to have managed his personal ties to India via video calls and visiting, the Tribunal does not consider the applicant’s family ties operate as a significant incentive for him to return home.

23. The Tribunal acknowledges the presence of the applicant’s sister in Australia. However, his evidence is that she lives in a different state and in these circumstances, it does not consider that the evidence suggests that the applicant has ties to Australia that may operate as a strong incentive for him to remain here.

24. The evidence in relation to the applicant’s economic circumstances is as follows. He has worked consistently in Australia since 2016. He declared he has worked as a customer service attendant between June 2016 and August 2019. He worked as an Assistant Night Manager at the Crowne Plaza between May 2018 and November 2019 and he currently works as the Night Manager at Crowne Plaza Hobart. He confirmed that he earns approximately $62,000AUD per annum. He states in his 359 Response that his annual expenses are $18,048AUD. He says he owns property in India including land and a house and also has savings.

25. The Tribunal does not consider that owning property overseas is an effective incentive for the applicant to return home. The Tribunal accepts he owns property in India. However, property may be readily sold or retained and utilised to produce income. Neither scenario requires the applicant to physically return home. Similarly, bank savings do not constitute an incentive for the applicant to return home. The Tribunal does note that there appears to be a significant gap between the applicant’s expenses and his earnings in his employment as a Night Manager. The Tribunal notes the economic disparity between Australia and India and is concerned that the applicant’s demonstrated ability to earn Australian Dollars through the course of ordinary employment operates as a significant incentive for him not to return home.

26. The applicant’s evidence is that he has travelled between Australia and India without issue. He appears to have complied with the requirements of his various visas since arriving in Australia. In these circumstances, the Tribunal makes no adverse findings in relation to his travel or immigration history.

27. There do not appear to be any further matters relevant to the application.

28. The Tribunal has considered all the evidence before it. It does not consider the applicant to be a genuine applicant. The Tribunal considers that the applicant has demonstrated a willingness to apply himself to his studies in Australia. He is clearly a capable student, as evidenced by his university level studies, including a Masters Degree. However, he has not been able to demonstrate how his university degrees are insufficient in any real way and the Tribunal does not consider that he will derive any benefit from completing the current study. He appears to be very well placed to return home and embark on a career and there he has not provided any reasonable reason why this cannot occur immediately.

29. On the basis of the above, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily. Accordingly, the applicant does not meet cl.500.212(a).

30. Accordingly, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student as required by cl.500.212.

31. Given the above findings, the Tribunal finds that the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are not met. The applicant does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa. Accordingly, the decision under review must be affirmed.

    DECISION

32. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.

    D Triaca
    Member

    
    

    Attachment – Direction No.69

    DIRECTION NUMBER 69 – ASSESSING THE GENUINE TEMPORARY ENTRANT CRITERION FOR STUDENT VISA AND STUDENT GUARDIAN VISA APPLICATIONS

    (Section 499)

    I, PETER DUTTON, Minister for Immigration and Border Protection give this Direction under section 499 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

    Dated: 18 April 2016

    Peter Dutton

    
    

    Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

    Note: Section 499(1) of the Act empowers the Minister to give a written direction to a person or body having functions or powers under the Act if the directions are about the performance of those functions; or the exercise of those powers. Under section 499(2) of the Act, the direction must not be inconsistent with the Act or the Migration Regulations 1994. Under section 499(2A) of the Act, the person or body must comply with the Direction.

    Part 1 of Direction No. 69 - Preliminary

    Name of Direction

    This Direction is Direction No. 69 - Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa and Student Guardian visa applications.

    It may be cited as Direction No. 69.

    Commencement

    This Direction commences on 1 July 2016.

    Interpretation

    Act means the Migration Act 1958.

    Genuine temporary entrant means a person who satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa or Student Guardian visa applications.

    Genuine temporary entrant criterion refers to clause 500.212(a), 500.312(a) and 590.215(a) at Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Home country has the same meaning as the definition of that term in regulation 1.03 in Part 1 of the Regulations.

    Regulations mean the Migration Regulations 1994.

    Relative has the same meaning as the definition of that term in regulation 1.03 in Part 1 of the Regulations.

    Spouse has the same meaning as the definition of the term in section 5F of the Act.

    Student visa means a Subclass 500 (Student) visa

    Student Guardian visa means a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

    Application

    This Direction applies to delegates performing functions or exercising powers under section 65 of the Act in relation to assessing an applicant’s temporary entrant criterion for Student visa applications in Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    This Direction also applies to members of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal who review the decisions of primary decision-makers in relation to a Student visa or a Student Guardian visa application.

    The genuine temporary entrant criterion must be satisfied by all applicants who make an application for either a Student visa seeking to satisfy the primary criteria for a Student Guardian visa.

    Preamble

    The Australian Government operates a student visa programme that enables people who are not Australian citizens or Australian permanent residents to undertake study in Australia. A person who wants to undertake a course of study under the student visa programme must obtain a student visa before they can commence a course of study in Australia.  A successful applicant must be both a genuine temporary entrant and a genuine student.

    An applicant who is a genuine temporary entrant will have circumstances that support a genuine intention to temporarily enter and remain in Australia, notwithstanding the potential for this intention to change over time to an intention to utilise lawful means to remain in Australia for an extended period of time or permanently.

    The genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa applications requires the Minister to be satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, having regard to:

    a.the applicant’s circumstances; and

    b.the applicant’s immigration history; and

    c.if the applicant is a minor — the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and

    d.any other relevant matter.

    This Direction provides guidance to decision makers on what factors require consideration when assessing the above paragraphs a to d, to determine whether the applicant genuinely intends to stay in Australia temporarily.

    Decision makers must take a reasonable and balanced approach between the need to make a timely decision on a Student visa or Student Guardian visa application and the need to identify those applicants who, at time of decision, do not genuinely intend to stay in Australia temporarily

    Part 2 of Direction No. 69 - Directions

    Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion

    1.Decision makers should not use the factors specified in this Direction as a checklist. The listed factors are intended only to guide decision makers when considering the applicant’s circumstances as a whole, in reaching a finding about whether the applicant satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion.

    2.Decision makers should assess whether, on balance, the genuine temporary entrant criterion is satisfied, by:

    a.considering the applicant against all factors specified in this Direction; and

    b.considering any other relevant information provided by the applicant (or information otherwise available to the decision maker).

    3.Decision makers may request additional information and/or further evidence from the applicant to demonstrate that they are a genuine temporary entrant, where closer scrutiny of the applicant's circumstances is considered appropriate.

    4.Circumstances where further scrutiny may be appropriate include but are not limited to:

    a.information in statistical, intelligence and analysis reports on migration fraud and immigration compliance compiled by the department indicates the need for further scrutiny;

    b.the applicant or a relative of the applicant has an immigration history of reasonable concern;

    c.the applicant intends to study in a field unrelated to their previous studies or employment; and

    d.apparent inconsistencies in information provided by the applicant in their Student visa application.

    5.An application for a Student visa or a Student Guardian visa should be refused if, after weighing up the applicant’s circumstances, immigration history and any other relevant matter, the decision maker is not satisfied that the applicant genuinely intends a temporary stay in Australia.

    The applicant’s circumstances

    6.Decision makers should have regard to the applicant’s circumstances in their home country and the applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia.

    7.For primary applicants of Subclass 500 Student visas, decision makers should have regard to the value of the course to the applicant’s future.

    8.Weight should be placed on an applicant’s circumstances that indicate that the Student visa or Student Guardian visa is intended primarily for maintaining residence in Australia.

    The applicant’s circumstances in their home country

    9.When considering the applicant’s circumstances in their home country, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:

    a.whether the applicant has reasonable reasons for not undertaking the study in their home country or region if a similar course is already available there. Decision makers should allow for any reasonable motives established by the applicant;

    b.the extent of the applicant’s personal ties to their home country (for example family, community and employment) and whether those circumstances would serve as a significant incentive to return to their home country;

    c.economic circumstances of the applicant that would present as a significant incentive for the applicant not to return to their home country. These circumstances may include consideration of the applicant’s circumstances relative to the home country and to Australia;

    d.military service commitments that would present as a significant incentive for the applicant not to return to their home country; and

    e.political and civil unrest in the applicant’s home country. This includes situations of a nature that may induce the applicant to apply for a Student visa or Student Guardian visa as means of obtaining entry to Australia for the purpose of remaining indefinitely. Decision makers should be aware of the changing circumstances in the applicant’s home country and the influence these may have on an applicant’s motivations for applying for a Student visa or a Student Guardian visa.

    10.Decision makers may have regard to the applicant’s circumstances in their home country relative to the circumstances of others in that country.

    The applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia

    11.In considering the applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:

    a.The applicant’s ties with Australia which would present as a strong incentive to remain in Australia. This may include family and community ties;

    b.evidence that the student visa programme is being used to circumvent the intentions of the migration programme;

    c.whether the Student visa or Student Guardian visa is being used to maintain ongoing residence;

    dwhether the primary and secondary applicant(s) have entered into a relationship of concern for a successful Student visa outcome. Where a decision maker determines that an applicant and dependant have contrived their relationship for a successful Student visa outcomes, the decision maker may find that both applicants do not satisfy the genuine temporary entrant criterion; and

    e.the applicant’s knowledge of living in Australia and their intended course of study and the associated education provider; including previous study and qualifications, what is a realistic level of knowledge an applicant is expected to know and the level of research the applicant has undertaken into their proposed course of study and living arrangements.

    Value of the course to the applicant’s future

    12.Decision makers should have regard to the following factors when considering the value of the course to the applicant’s future:

    a.whether the student is seeking to undertake a course that is consistent with their current level of education and whether the course will assist the applicant to obtain employment or improve employment prospects in their home country. Decision makers should allow for reasonable changes to career or study pathways; and

    b.relevance of the course to the student’s past or proposed future employment either in their home country or a third country; and

    c.remuneration the applicant could expect to receive in the home country or a third country, compared with Australia, using the qualifications to be gained from the proposed course of study.

    The applicant's immigration history

    13.An applicant’s immigration history refers both to their visa and travel history.

    14.When considering the applicant’s immigration history, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:

    a.Previous visa applications for Australia or other countries, including:

    i.if the applicant previously applied for an Australian temporary or permanent visa, whether those visa applications are yet to be finally determined (within the meaning of subsection 5(9) of the Act), were granted, or grounds on which the application(s) were refused; and

    ii.if the applicant has previously applied for visa(s) to other countries, whether the applicant was refused a visa and the circumstances that led to visa refusal.

    b.Previous travels to Australia or other countries, including:

    i.if the applicant previously travelled to Australia, whether they complied with the conditions of their visa and left before their visa ceased, and if not, were there circumstances beyond their control;

    ii.whether the applicant previously held a visa that was cancelled or considered for cancellation, and the associated circumstances;

    iii.the amount of time the applicant has spent in Australia and whether the Student visa or Student Guardian visa may be used primarily for maintaining ongoing residence, including whether the applicant has undertaken a series of short, inexpensive courses, or has been onshore for some time without successfully completing a qualification; and

    iv.if the applicant has travelled to countries other than Australia, whether they complied with the migration laws of that country and the circumstances around any non-compliance

    If the applicant is a minor— the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant

    15.If the primary or secondary applicant for a Subclass 500 Student visa is a minor, decision makers should have regard to the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant.

    Any other relevant matters

    16.Decision makers should also have regard to any other relevant information provided by the applicant (or information otherwise available to the decision maker) when assessing the applicant’s intention to temporarily stay in Australia. This includes information that may be either beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.