[2004] QDC 071
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTIONJUDGE HOATH
No 141 of 2004
JACQUES SABEE Applicant and A Respondent BRISBANE
..DATE 11/03/2004ORDER
11032004 T01/EGR18 M/T CMS25/2004 (Hoath DCJ)
HIS HONOUR: This is an application by Jacques Sabee for 1 compensation for injuries received as a result of the offence
of assault occasioning bodily harm whilst armed and in company
committed upon him by the respondent, A, on the 29th of
October 1999. The respondent was convicted of that offence in
10
the District Court on the 12th of February 2001. At the time
of the offence, the applicant was 58 years of age.He was at the Inala Civic Centre, waiting to catch a bus when he remonstrated with the respondent, a 17 year old youth, over
20
the respondent wantonly damaging a shopping trolley. The
respondent reacted by grabbing an iron bar and striking the
applicant once to the left rib area and once to the left
forearm before striking the respondent twice to the top of thehead. Following the assault, the applicant immediately
30
attended the Inala Medical Centre where two seven centimetre
lacerations to his forehead were sutured.The applicant was also observed to have swelling to his left elbow and bruising to the left side of his chest. As a result
40
of the blow to his ribs, the applicant suffered pain and
discomfort for approximately a month. The injuries to his
head caused headaches on and off for a period of six to eight
weeks. The wounds to the applicant's forehead have howeverhealed without any continuing disability and the scars are
50
covered by his hair.
The applicant has become hyper vigilant when in public and
believes that he has lost some confidence. He does not
11032004 T01/EGR18 M/T CMS25/2004 (Hoath DCJ)2 ORDER 60
experience any flashbacks or nightmares, but does think about 1 the assault from time to time. There was no conduct on the
part of the applicant that directly or indirectly contributed
to the injury or injuries suffered by him. The applicant's
entitlement to compensation falls to be assessed on the basis
10
of the lacerations to his scalp, bruising and some mental and
nervous shock.All those injuries are injuries referred to in the compensation table in schedule 1 of the Criminal Offence
20
Victims Act. In my view, a reasonable assessment of the applicant's entitlement is, as to the bruising and lacerations, five per cent. And as to the mental and nervous shock, five per cent, giving a total of 10 per cent of the scheme maximum of $75,000, namely, $7,500.
30
I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $7,500 by way of compensation for the injury received as a result of the offence of assault occasioning bodily harm whilst armed and in company for which the respondent was
40
convicted on the 12th of February 2001.
-----
50
3 ORDER 60
- AGLC
- Sabee v A [2004] QDC 71
- Case
- [2004] QDC 71
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court faced the task of assessing the severity of the injuries and their impact on Sabee's life, as well as determining the appropriate compensation under the Criminal Offences Victims Act. The injuries included two seven-centimetre lacerations to Sabee's forehead, swelling and bruising on his left elbow and chest, persistent headaches, and a degree of psychological distress. Given the nature and duration of the injuries, the court had to evaluate both the physical and psychological harm to provide a fair compensation amount.
In assessing the injuries, the court found that the bruising and lacerations warranted a five percent assessment, and the mental and nervous shock also warranted a five percent assessment. This led to a total of ten percent of the scheme maximum compensation of $75,000, equating to $7,500. The court concluded that this amount appropriately reflected the harm caused and ordered A to pay Sabee $7,500 as compensation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.