Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SAAD v TWT LTD [1998] NSWCA 199 Decision date: 29 May 1998
See Attachment (PDF)
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Saad v TWT Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
Details
- Case
- [1998] NSWCA 199
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Saad v TWT Ltd*, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered a dispute between the plaintiff, Mr. Saad, and the defendant, TWT Ltd. The case concerned an appeal against a decision that had dismissed Mr. Saad's claim for damages for defamation.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the trial judge had erred in finding that the imputation conveyed by the defendant's publication was not defamatory of the plaintiff. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the words published, when read in their ordinary and natural meaning, exposed the plaintiff to hatred, ridicule, or contempt, or lowered him in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.
The Court of Appeal analysed the meaning of the words complained of in their context. It applied the established legal principle that the meaning of defamatory words is that which reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand them to convey. The court found that the trial judge had correctly assessed the ordinary and natural meaning of the publication and had not made any error in concluding that the imputation was not defamatory.
Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the trial judge had erred in finding that the imputation conveyed by the defendant's publication was not defamatory of the plaintiff. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the words published, when read in their ordinary and natural meaning, exposed the plaintiff to hatred, ridicule, or contempt, or lowered him in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.
The Court of Appeal analysed the meaning of the words complained of in their context. It applied the established legal principle that the meaning of defamatory words is that which reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand them to convey. The court found that the trial judge had correctly assessed the ordinary and natural meaning of the publication and had not made any error in concluding that the imputation was not defamatory.
Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.