SA Precast Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 8017


[2019] FWCA 8017
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

SA Precast Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4070)

SA PRECAST PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Cement and concrete products

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 25 NOVEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the SA Precast Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SA Precast Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by SA Precast Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 8 November 2019.

[3] On 19 November 2019, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 21 November 2019. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  The reference to industrial action in clause 1.6 of the Agreement does not extend to lawful industrial action taken by employees under the Act.

  The reference to twenty days annual leave in clause 13.2 of the Agreement will be taken to be four weeks.

  An ordinary employee, other than a casual employee, will be paid for ordinary hours they miss due to a public holiday.

  The entitlement to compassionate leave extends to the applicable circumstances relating to a de facto partner or sibling of the employee or a child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, or sibling of a spouse or de facto partner.

  Part time employees will be paid overtime for hours worked in excess of their agreed hours of work.

  Where a level 1, 2, 3 or 4 employee works in excess of ten days’ broken shift work in a four week period, the Applicant will ensure that the employee’s total gross earnings for that four week period is more than what the employee would have been entitled to under the Concrete Products Award 2010 (the Award). If the employee’s earnings for that period are not more than what they would have been entitled to under the Award, the Applicant will adjust the employee’s total gross earnings for that period to equal the total gross earnings that would otherwise be payable to the employee under the Award, plus $1.00.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] As the Agreement does not contain a flexibility term which meets the requirements of s.203 of the Act, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 24 November 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506222  PR714582>

Details
AGLC
SA Precast Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 8017
Case
[2019] FWCA 8017
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were SA Precast Pty Ltd and its employees, who were represented by the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union. The dispute centred on the application for approval of the SA Precast Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The central legal issues were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly whether it was made in good faith and whether it provided for minimum entitlements as stipulated by the Act. The court had to examine whether the agreement was fairly and properly negotiated and if it complied with all relevant legislative provisions.

The Fair Work Commission assessed the negotiation process and the contents of the agreement to ensure that it met the statutory criteria for approval. The Commission examined evidence from both parties regarding the negotiation process and the provisions of the agreement. The court found that the agreement was made in good faith, with both parties engaging in genuine negotiations. The Commission also confirmed that the agreement provided for all minimum entitlements as required by the Fair Work Act, including provisions for wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and it approved the application.

Based on its findings, the Fair Work Commission granted approval for the SA Precast Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019. The decision was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, ensuring that the agreement was fair and reasonable for both the employer and the employees. The court emphasised the importance of good faith negotiations and compliance with legislative requirements in approving enterprise agreements. The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement, which was to be registered and in effect from the date of the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.