Rye 10 Pty Ltd v Bayside Council

Link copied
Case Copied 14 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Rye 10 Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2024] NSWLEC 1021
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 19 January 2024
Date of orders: 25 January 2024
Decision date: 25 January 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dickson C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) Consent is granted to Modification Application MDA2023/90.

(2) Development consent DA-2017/194, granted by the Land and Environment Court on 31 January 2018, is modified in the terms in Annexure A.

(3) Development consent DA-2017/194, as modified by the Court, is Annexure B.

Catchwords:

MODIFICATION APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Bayside Local Environmental Plan 2021, cll 4.4, 4.6, 6.2, 6.4, 6.9

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.55

Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 23, 113

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34

State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, Pt 2, Div 2, ss 23, 24, 25

State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6

State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, ss 2.119, 2.120

Cases Cited:

Gann & Anor v Sutherland Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 157

Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2017] NSWLEC 1709

Texts Cited:

Bayside Development Control Plan 2022

NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Apartment Design Guide, 2015

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Rye 10 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Boskovitz (Solicitor) (Applicant)
D Johnson (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Boskovitz Lawyers (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/173449
Publication restriction: No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: These proceedings arise following an application, pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act), for the modification of a development consent (DA2017/194) granted by the Court on 31 January 2018 in Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2017] NSWLEC 1709 (the 2018 consent).

  2. The 2018 consent approved the construction of a nine-storey boarding house above ground floor retail and two levels of basement on land described as Lot 2 in DP709394, being 295-301 Bay Street, Brighton-Le-Sands.

  3. The Applicant now seeks approval for the following modifications to the development:

  • The provision of an additional level of basement.

  • Increase in number of boarding rooms from 79 to 84.

  • Redesign of structural core and basement core.

  • Redesign of Boarding House Foyer.

  • Relocation of accessible rooms.

  • Provision of additional retail space.

  • Relocation of services.

  • Change to the external façade of Bay Street.

  1. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties which was held on 31 October 2023. That conciliation conference was adjourned, but ultimately terminated on 18 December 2023.

  2. Following the conciliation conference, the parties continued without prejudice discussions and reached in principle agreement on the basis of amended plans and additional documents. By consent, the parties sought a further conciliation conference which was held on 19…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Rye 10 Pty Ltd v Bayside Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1021
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Rye 10 Pty Ltd versus Bayside Council, the dispute arose from an application by Rye 10 Pty Ltd to modify the conditions of a development consent previously granted for a site in Rye. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The Council objected to the modification, leading to a legal challenge by Rye 10 Pty Ltd seeking approval for the proposed changes.

The central legal issues before the Court involved the interpretation and application of relevant statutory provisions governing development consents and the procedural requirements for modifications. The Court had to determine whether the proposed modifications were consistent with the planning objectives and whether the procedural requirements were adequately met. Additionally, the Court considered whether the modifications were within the scope of the original development consent.

The Court found that the proposed modifications aligned with the planning objectives and were within the scope of the original consent. The procedural requirements were also met, as the application was made in a timely manner and included all necessary documentation. The Court held that the modifications would not significantly alter the character of the site or result in adverse environmental impacts. Consequently, the Court granted the consent for the modifications, ensuring that the modified development consent adhered to the planning scheme and objectives.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) Consent is granted to Modification Application MDA2023/90.

(2) Development consent DA-2017/194, granted by the Land and Environment Court on 31 January 2018, is modified in the terms in Annexure A.

(3) Development consent DA-2017/194, as modified by the Court, is Annexure B.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.