Ryan v Cain & anor Ryan v O'Halloran & anor Ryan v Bhagria & anor Ryan v Bunnings Group Limited Ryan v Eastlake Football Club Limited
[2023] HCASL 1
Ryan
v
Cain & anor
Ryan
v
O'Halloran & anor
Ryan
v
Bhagria & anor
Ryan
v
Bunnings Group Limited
Ryan
v
Eastlake Football Club Limited
[2023] HCASL 1
C20/2022
C21/2022
C22/2022
C23/2022
C24/2022
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory (Elkaim, Kennett and Stewart JJ) dismissing his appeals in respect of claims against seven defendants for alleged personal injury to him arising from five separate incidents.
The applicant has not identified a question of principle of general importance sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal and otherwise advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. An appeal to this Court would enjoy no prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension that is sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the applications.
M.M. Gordon
S.H.P. Steward
9 February 2023
0
0