Rustrum Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council

Case

[2017] NSWLEC 1511

15 September 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Rustrum Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2017] NSWLEC 1511
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 April & 15 September 2017
Date of orders: 15 September 2017
Decision date: 15 September 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Martin SC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Rustrum Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
Mr Doyle(Applicant)
Solicitor:
Ms A Johnstone, Connor & Co Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr M Ball, Central Coast Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/382173
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Leave is granted to the applicant to rely on the amended plans referred to in condition 2 of annexure “A”;

  3. Consent is granted to development application 731/2016, for a mixed use development comprising 71 residential units, 38 tourist accommodation units, commercial premises with basement parking at 216-222 Main Road, 21 Rowland Terrace, Toukley, being Lot 2, 3 & 4 DP 406181, Lot 2 DP 213097, and Part Lot 91 DP 565884 and at 224-232 Main Road, Toukley being Lot 5 DP 514932 and Lot 1 DP 213097, subject to the conditions contained in the annexure marked “A” to this agreement.

……………………….

Senior Commissioner Martin

Annexure A (513 KB, pdf)

Amendments

19 September 2017 - Amendment to representation name

Decision last updated: 19 September 2017

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1