Rupinder Kaur v Desi Hatti Pty Ltd Atf Desi Hatti Trust

Case

[2023] FWC 1918

2 AUGUST 2023


[2023] FWC 1918

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.365—General protections

Rupinder Kaur
v

Desi Hatti Pty Ltd Atf Desi Hatti Trust

(C2023/2219)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 2 AUGUST 2023

Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal – application dismissed.

  1. On 18 April 2023, Ms Rupinder Kaur (the Applicant) made an application under s 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Applicant alleges that they were dismissed in contravention of the general protection provisions in Part 3-1 of the Act.

  1. The application was incomplete insofar as Question 3.3 on the Form F8 was not filled out. Moreover, the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (the Regulations) or by a completed application for waiver of the filing fee (the waiver application). The Applicant has not responded to correspondence from the Commission alerting them to these deficiencies, nor have they been rectified. I have decided to dismiss the application for the following reasons.

Context

  1. On 24 April 2023, the Commission sent an application acknowledgement letter to the Applicant.

  1. Also on 24 April 2023, the Commission attempted to call the Applicant at her nominated phone number. The Applicant did not answer. A detailed voice message was left at her number requesting that the Applicant contact the Commission with regards to completing Question 3.3 of her Form F8 as well as paying the required lodgement fee. The voice message also quoted the Applicant’s matter number and provided a callback number for the Commission.

  1. Moreover, an email was sent to the Applicant’s nominated email address on 24 April 2023 requesting an answer to Question 3.3 and payment of the required lodgement fee or alternatively a waiver application within 14 days (or by 8 May 2023) in order for the matter to progress.

  1. On 30 May 2023, the Commission made a final attempt to call the Applicant at her nominated phone number. The Applicant did not answer. A detailed voice message was left at her number requesting the supply of the outstanding information by COB on 1 June 2023 or the matter would be referred to a Commission member and likely be dismissed.

  1. To date, the Applicant has not paid the required lodgement fee or filed a completed waiver application.

Legislative framework

  1. In relation to an application made pursuant to s.365 of the Act, s.367(1) provides that the application “must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.” At the time the application was made, the regulations prescribed a fee of $77.80. The regulations also allow for an application to be made for the fee to be waived.

  1. Section 587 of the Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), the FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773, or an application under section 527F that does not consist solely of an application for a stop sexual harassment order, on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

Consideration and conclusion

  1. The applicant has neither paid the lodgement fee nor sought a fee waiver. Accordingly, the application is not made in accordance with s.367 of the Act.

  1. The applicant has taken no action to address the deficiency despite being notified of it by the Commission on multiple occasions. In these circumstances, I have decided to exercise my discretion to dismiss the application in accordance with s.587(1)(a) of the Act.

  2. The application is dismissed.


VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR764840>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0