Royce & Donovan
Case
•
[2012] FamCA 168
•23 March 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Royce & Donovan [2012] FamCA 168
[2012] FamCA 168
23 March 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Royce & Donovan*, Kent J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application filed by the Wife. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the outcome indicates it concerned matters within the Family Court's jurisdiction.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Wife's application, filed on 29 February 2012, should be dismissed. The court was required to determine the merits of this application and make a consequential order.
Kent J dismissed the Wife's application. The court further ordered that each party's costs of and incidental to this specific application be reserved to the trial, meaning the final determination of costs for this interlocutory step would be made at a later stage of the proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Wife's application, filed on 29 February 2012, should be dismissed. The court was required to determine the merits of this application and make a consequential order.
Kent J dismissed the Wife's application. The court further ordered that each party's costs of and incidental to this specific application be reserved to the trial, meaning the final determination of costs for this interlocutory step would be made at a later stage of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Royce & Donovan [2012] FamCA 168
Most Recent Citation
Attar & Melidi [2023] FedCFamC1F 342
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Salmon and Salmon & Ors (No 2)
[2019] FamCA 910
Berrell and Berrell
[2013] FamCA 676
Attar & Melidi
[2023] FedCFamC1F 342
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
Smith and Smith (No 2)
[2009] FamCA 1223
Simonsen & Simonsen
[2009] FamCA 698