Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section)

Case [2020] FWCA 4299


[2020] FWCA 4299
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section)
(AG2020/2062)

ROYAL FLYING DOCTOR SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA (SOUTH-EASTERN SECTION) ENGINEERS AGREEMENT 2020

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 14 AUGUST 2020

Application for approval of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South-Eastern Section) Engineers Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South-Eastern Section) Engineers Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 10.3 – Termination;

  Clause 26.6 – Annual Leave; and

    ● Clause 28.1 – Personal/Carers Leave

However, noting the written undertaking provided by the Employer, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 August 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 August 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE508743  PR721853>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section) [2020] FWCA 4299
Case
[2020] FWCA 4299
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case concerning the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South-Eastern Section), the Fair Work Commission was tasked with approving the Engineers Agreement 2020. The dispute arose from negotiations between the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South-Eastern Section) and its employees represented by the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union. The agreement aimed to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for the engineers within the organisation.

The central legal issues before the Commission involved assessing whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was "better off overall" for the employees, as mandated by section 235 of the Act. The assessment required a detailed analysis of the proposed terms, including wages, conditions, and any additional benefits, against the existing awards and enterprise agreements.

The Commission meticulously reviewed the submissions from both parties and conducted a comprehensive analysis of the proposed agreement. It concluded that the agreement provided significant improvements in terms of wages, leave entitlements, and other working conditions, making it more advantageous for the employees overall. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its benefits and its compliance with the statutory requirements.

As a result of the Commission's approval, the Engineers Agreement 2020 was formally accepted, and it now governs the employment terms of the engineers within the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South-Eastern Section). This decision underscores the importance of ensuring that any new agreement enhances the employees' overall conditions and adheres to the legislative framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.