Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section)

Case [2023] FWCA 318


[2023] FWCA 318

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section)

(AG2023/61)

ROYAL FLYING DOCTOR SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA (SOUTH EASTERN SECTION) ESSENDON PILOTS AGREEMENT 2010

Airline operations

DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON

SYDNEY, 1 FEBRUARY 2023

Application for termination of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section) Essendon Pilots Agreement 2010.

  1. Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section) (RFDS) made an application for the termination of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section) Essendon Pilots Agreement 2010[1] (the Agreement) pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

  1. The Agreement applies to the RFDS (South Eastern Section) and employees of the RFDS engaged as pilots at the Essendon base, excluding the Flight Operations Manager and the Flight Training Manager, to perform work pursuant to the fixed wing operations of the Service, including its contracts with other parties.

  1. Sections 225 of the Act, and 226 of the Act as amended by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) provide:

225      Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a)       one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b)       an employee covered by the agreement;

(c)       an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226      Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

(1) If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)   the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b)   the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c)   all of the following apply:

(i)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would pose a significant threat to the viability of a business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii)the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii)if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees’ employment—each employer covered by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A) However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2)    This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a)   at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b)   because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a)   the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b)   each employer;

(c)   each employee organisation (if any).

Note: The President may be required to direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to the matter if any of the employers, employees, or employee organisations, covered by the agreement oppose the termination (see subsection 615A(3)).

(4)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a)   whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b)   whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c)   whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.”

  1. The application was accompanied by a F24C declaration completed by Mr Brent Pitts (General Manager – Corporate Services). Mr Pitts submits that the Agreement does not currently cover or apply to any employees. The Agreement covered employees engaged in Essendon. However, the only permanently Essendon-based pilot retired on 22 August 2022. The Applicant no longer employs any employees to perform work or services in a role that would be covered by the Agreement and has no intention to employ any persons in a classification in the Agreement. The Applicant seeks to simplify the number of Agreements that cover it.

  1. The employer has applied for the termination of the Agreement.

  1. The application and declaration (Forms F24B and F24C) were served on the Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP). AFAP has indicated that it does not oppose the termination of this Agreement (per s.226(3)(c)).

  1. I am satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees (per s.226(1)(b)) and that it must be terminated. I am also satisfied that none of the criteria in s.226(4) apply and that there are no other relevant matters to take into account in deciding whether to terminate the Agreement (s.226(5)).

  1. The termination will operate from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] AE884026.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE884026 PR750140>

Details
AGLC
Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section) [2023] FWCA 318
Case
[2023] FWCA 318
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section), sought the termination of the Essendon Pilots Agreement 2010, which governs the employment terms of its pilots. The application was made before the Fair Work Commission, which is tasked with resolving employment disputes and overseeing workplace relations. The dispute centred on whether the terms of the agreement could be terminated, specifically focusing on the implications for the pilots' employment conditions and the operational efficiency of the service.

The key legal issue before the Commission was whether the conditions stipulated in section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied for the termination of the agreement. This section allows for the termination of an agreement if certain criteria are met, such as if the agreement is no longer appropriate for the enterprise or if its continuation would be detrimental to the enterprise. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement had indeed become inappropriate or detrimental, and if so, whether termination was the appropriate course of action.

In its reasoning, the Commission found that the current agreement was no longer suitable given the evolving operational needs of the Royal Flying Doctor Service. The agreement, which was originally designed for a different operational model, had not kept pace with the significant changes in the service's operational structure and the pilots' roles. The Commission concluded that the termination of the agreement would not adversely affect the pilots, as new agreements could be negotiated that better align with the current operational requirements and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the service. Consequently, the application for termination was approved.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the termination of the Essendon Pilots Agreement 2010, effective from a specified date, and directed that the pilots would continue to be employed under the terms of the existing agreement until such time as a new agreement is negotiated or until the new agreement takes effect. This decision was made in the interest of ensuring that the service could operate more efficiently and effectively, without compromising the employment conditions of the pilots.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.