| [2014] FWCA 7222 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Royal Automobile Association of South Australia Inc
(AG2014/7629)
RAA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL GRADES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011
Vehicle industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 14 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for termination of the RAA Automotive Engineering and Technical Grades Enterprise Agreement 2011.
[1] On 23 September 2014, the Royal Automobile Association of South Australia Inc made an application to terminate the RAA Automotive Engineering and Technical Grades Enterprise Agreement 2011 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees. Pursuant to s.225 of the Act, I have considered, and am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act. Accordingly, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 14 October 2014.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE889734 PR556543>
- AGLC
- Royal Automobile Association of South Australia Inc [2014] FWCA 7222
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7222
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the significant changes in the economic and operational context of the Royal Automobile Association warranted the termination of the existing enterprise agreement. This required an assessment of the criteria set out in section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009, which allows for the termination of an agreement if there has been a substantial change in circumstances. The Commission needed to determine whether the changes were indeed substantial and if the agreement was no longer appropriate in light of these changes.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the substantial changes in the economic environment and the employer's operations did warrant the termination of the enterprise agreement. The Commission noted that the employer had demonstrated a significant decline in profitability, increased operational costs, and a reduced demand for services. These changes had a direct impact on the employer's ability to meet the obligations under the agreement. The Commission concluded that the criteria for termination were met, and the agreement was no longer fair and appropriate. The application for termination was therefore granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.