Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2004] AATA 662
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No W2003/58
VETERAN'S APPEALS DIVISION ) Re TREVOR JOHN ROWE Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Brigadier R D F Lloyd, Member Date25 June 2004
PlacePerth
Decision Pursuant to s 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, the Tribunal decides:
(a) to set aside the Veterans’ Review Board (“VRB”) decision under review of 14 November 2002 in so far as it rejected Lumbar Spondylosis and to accept that condition as being war-caused with effect from 1 June 1999;
(b) to affirm the VRB decision under review in so far as it rejected the conditions of Anxiety Disorder and Psoriasis as being war-caused; and
(c) to remit the matter of assessment of incapacity from the now accepted Lumbar Spondylosis, together with all other accepted conditions, to the respondent.
............(sgd R D F Lloyd)....................
Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS – Veterans’ entitlements – ex RAN with operational service WWII – claims anxiety disorder, psoriasis and lumbar spondylosis– anxiety disorder and psoriases rejected as hypotheses did not fit template of SoPs – lumbar spondylosis accepted on basis of lifting of weights/weight bearing to cumulative total of 120,000 kg – assessment of incapacity remitted to respondent.
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 120, 120A, 196B (2)
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82
Kattenberg v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 412
Stoddart v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 334
Repatriation Commission v Gosenwinckel [1999] FCA 1273
Cornelius v Repatriation Commission [2001] AATA 890
Statement of Principle Concerning Anxiety Disorder (Instrument No 1 of 2000)
Statement of Principle Concerning Lumbar Spondylosis (Instrument No 46 of 2002 as amended)
Statement of Principle Concerning Psoriasis (Instrument No 56 of 2002)
REASONS FOR DECISION
25 June 2004 Brigadier R D F Lloyd, Member 1. This is an application before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) by Trevor John Bowden Rowe (“the applicant”) for a review of the VRB decision of 14 November 2002 which:
(a)affirmed the decision of the Repatriation Commission (“the respondent”) of 19 January 2000 insofar as it determined that the conditions of Lumbar Spondylosis and Psoriasis were not war-caused;
(b)affirmed the respondent’s decisions of 30 October 2001 insofar as it was determined that the conditions of Anxiety Disorder and (again) Psoriasis were not war-caused, and that disability pension be paid at 40% of the General Rate.
2. The applicant attended the hearing and was assisted by his advocate Mr C Hammal. The respondent was represented by Mr C Ponnuthurai. The Tribunal had before it the documents filed pursuant to s 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (“the T documents”). In addition, the following documents were taken into evidence:
(a)Tendered by the respondent:
·Exhibit R1: The transcript of VRB proceedings re T Rowe of 14 November 2002;
·Exhibit R2: Letter to Mr Rowe from Mr Ponnuthurai dated 25 September 2003, with attachment of two pages of the publication titled “War at Sea in the…
Continue reading Rowe and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Rowe and Repatriation Commission [2004] AATA 662
- Case
- [2004] AATA 662
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The AAT examined whether the applicant's claims for anxiety disorder and psoriasis could be accepted under the relevant statements of principle. It found that the conditions did not fit the templates provided in the statements, leading to their rejection. However, the AAT accepted the claim for lumbar spondylosis because the applicant's service involved lifting and carrying weights to a cumulative total of 120,000 kg, which aligned with the criteria in the Statement of Principle Concerning Lumbar Spondylosis. The AAT also noted that the Commission's assessment of incapacity needed reassessment in light of the newly accepted condition.
Consequently, the AAT set aside the Veterans’ Review Board's decision in part, accepting the claim for lumbar spondylosis and rejecting the claims for anxiety disorder and psoriasis. It also remitted the matter of incapacity assessment back to the Commission to consider the newly accepted condition along with any other accepted conditions. This decision highlighted the importance of aligning service activities with the criteria in the statements of principle for successful claims.
Orders
Orders of the court
Pursuant to s 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, the Tribunal decides:
(a) to set aside the Veterans’ Review Board (“VRB”) decision under review of 14 November 2002 in so far as it rejected Lumbar Spondylosis and to accept that condition as being war-caused with effect from 1 June 1999;
(b) to affirm the VRB decision under review in so far as it rejected the conditions of Anxiety Disorder and Psoriasis as being war-caused; and
(c) to remit the matter of assessment of incapacity from the now accepted Lumbar Spondylosis, together with all other accepted conditions, to the respondent.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.