Rout v Thompson
[1905] HCA 71
•3 November 1905
3 C.L.R.] OF AUSTRALIA.
1001
Appeal allowed. Order absolute.
Case re- H- C. of a.
mitted to the magistrate for re-hearing.
Christie
Solicitor, for appellant, Charles Powers, Crown Solicitor for tlie
V.
A h
S h e c n o .
Commonwealth.
Solicitor, for respondent, Sabelherg, Melbourne.
B. L.
[HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.]
ROUT .
Appellant:
Plaintiff,
AND
THOMPSON AND SEA RSO N
Respondents.
Defendants,
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA.
( H o m b e r g
J.)
Tlie case turned solely on questions of fact.
H. c. of a
The judgment of the Suprem e C ourt of South A ustralia (2nd
1905.
June 1905} was affirmed.
A delaide,
Nov. 3.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Griffith C.J., Barton and
O'Connor
JJ .
Solicitor, for appellant, Neshit.
Solicitor, for respondents, Stuart.
H. E. M.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
0
0
0