Rout v Thompson

Case

[1905] HCA 71

3 November 1905

No judgment structure available for this case.

3 C.L.R.] OF AUSTRALIA.

1001

Appeal allowed. Order absolute.

Case re- H- C. of a.

mitted to the magistrate for re-hearing.

Christie

Solicitor, for appellant, Charles Powers, Crown Solicitor for tlie

V.

A h

S h e c n o .

Commonwealth.

Solicitor, for respondent, Sabelherg, Melbourne.

B. L.

[HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.]

ROUT .

Appellant:

Plaintiff,

AND

THOMPSON AND SEA RSO N

Respondents.

Defendants,

ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF

SOUTH AUSTRALIA.

( H o m b e r g

J.)

Tlie case turned solely on questions of fact.

H. c. of a

The judgment of the Suprem e C ourt of South A ustralia (2nd

1905.

June 1905} was affirmed.

A delaide,

Nov. 3.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Griffith C.J., Barton and

O'Connor

JJ .

Solicitor, for appellant, Neshit.

Solicitor, for respondents, Stuart.

H. E. M.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0