Rous (Migration)
[2020] AATA 1877
•12 May 2020
Rous (Migration) [2020] AATA 1877 (12 May 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr John Sebastian Rous
CASE NUMBER: 2004101
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2016/2338438
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: United Kingdom
MEMBER:Moira Brophy
DATE:12 May 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 (Spouse) visa:
·PIC 4007(1) for the purposes of cl.820.223(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Statement made on 12 May 2020 at 10:50am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – Subclass 820 (Spouse) – health criterion – documentation of specified medical examination provided to tribunal – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 1.15F(1), Schedule 2, cl 820.223(1)(a), Schedule 4, criterion 4007(1)
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 19 February 2020 to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The visa applicant applied for the visa on 12 July 2016. The delegate refused to grant the visa as the applicant did not satisfy cl.820.223(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the health criteria in Public Interest Criterion (‘PIC’) 4007 of Schedule 4 to the Regulations was not met.
The applicant has now provided evidence the necessary medical assessment has been undertaken. The tribunal has determined that since the relevant documentation has been provided a decision could be made on the papers.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The issue in this review is whether the visa applicant meets Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4007 as required by the criteria for the grant of the visa. Public Interest Criterion 4007, as it applies to this case, is extracted in the attachment to this decision. It requires the applicant, in certain circumstances, to undergo medical assessment, and to be free of certain diseases or conditions that may impact on the community. This last requirement may be waived in certain circumstances. The applicant in this case had not provided evidence that they had undertaken or made arrangements to undertake the assessment required to show they were able to meet the health requirement as outlined in Public Interest Criterion 4007.
The Tribunal is satisfied that the Minister requested an assessment to determine if the visa applicant is free of certain diseases or conditions that may impact on the community. On 24 February 2020 evidence was provided that BUPA had conducted the relevant medical examination and the Tribunal has had regard to the Department's ICYS records and is satisfied that his health requirements are recorded as autocleared on 24 February 2020 in the Department's system.
As the applicant has provided the requested documentation, the delegate is now able to assess whether the applicant meets PIC 4007 for the purposes of cl.820.223(1)(a).
The Tribunal considers the appropriate course of action is to remit the application to the Minister to undertake consideration of whether the applicant meets PIC 4007 for the purposes of cl.820.223(1)(a) and the remaining criteria for the grant of a Subclass 820 visa.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 (Spouse) visa:
·PIC 4007(1)(a) for the purposes of cl.820.223(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Moira Brophy
Member
ATTACHMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
Schedule 4
4007(1) The applicant:
(aa) if the applicant is in a class of persons specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph:
(i)must undertake any medical assessment specified in the instrument; and
(ii)must be assessed by the person specified in the instrument;
unless a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth decides otherwise; and
(ab) must comply with any request by a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth to undertake a medical assessment; and
(a) is free from tuberculosis; and
(b) is free from a disease or condition that is, or may result in the applicant being, a threat to public health in Australia or a danger to the Australian community; and
(c) subject to subclause (2) — is free from a disease or condition in relation to which:
(i)a person who has it would be likely to:
(A)require health care or community services; or
(B)meet the medical criteria for the provision of a community service;
during the period described in subclause (1A); and
(ii)the provision of the health care or community services would be likely to:
(A)result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care and community services; or
(B)prejudice the access of an Australian citizen or permanent resident to health care or community services;
regardless of whether the health care or community services will actually be used in connection with the applicant; and
(d) if the applicant is a person from whom a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth has requested a signed undertaking to present himself or herself to a health authority in the State or Territory of intended residence in Australia for a follow-up medical assessment — has provided the undertaking.
(1A)For subparagraph (1)(c)(i), the period is:
(a) for an application for a permanent visa — the period commencing when the application is made; or
(b) for an application for a temporary visa:
(i)the period for which the Minister intends to grant the visa; or
(ii)if the visa is of a subclass specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subparagraph — the period commencing when the application is made.
(1B)If:
(a) the applicant applies for a temporary visa; and
(b) the subclass being applied for is not specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for subparagraph (1A)(b)(ii);
the reference in sub-subparagraph (1)(c)(ii)(A) to health care and community services does not include the health care and community services specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for this subclause.
(2)The Minister may waive the requirements of paragraph (1)(c) if.
(a) the applicant satisfies all other criteria for the grant of the visa applied for; and
(b) the Minister is satisfied that the granting of the visa would be unlikely to result in:
(i)undue cost to the Australian community; or
(ii)undue prejudice to the access to health care or community services of an Australian citizen or permanent resident.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0