Rosingana Varea (Migration)

Case

[2021] AATA 5384

11 November 2021


Rosingana Varea (Migration) [2021] AATA 5384 (11 November 2021)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Miss Isabella Rosingana Varea

CASE NUMBER:  2113910

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/1103902

MEMBER:Denise Connolly

DATE:11 November 2021

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

Statement made on 11 November 2021 at 11:46am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – character test – statement from an appropriate authority – Complete Disclosure Australian Federal Police Certificate – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA; Schedule 2, cl 485.216; Schedule 4, PIC 4001

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 11 February 2020. The criteria for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations.

  3. Regulation 2.03AA of the Regulations applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: reg 2.03AA(1). In this case, cl 485.216 of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in reg 2.03AA(2).

  4. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: reg 2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

  5. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 6 October 2021 on the basis that the applicant did not meet reg 2.03AA because, in response to a request for further information from the delegate, the applicant provided a standard disclosure from the AFP, not a complete disclosure.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  6. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided a statement by an appropriate authority that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history.

    Has the applicant provided a statement from an appropriate authority?

  7. On 5 June 2020 the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a Complete Disclosure Australian Federal Police Certificate. The applicant provided a Standard Disclosure which is not the Complete Disclosure Australian Federal Police clearance requested by the Department.

  8. The applicant has now provided to the Tribunal a copy of a National Police Certificate – Immigration/Citizenship certificate issued by the AFP on 13 October 2021 certifying that there are no disclosable outcomes recorded against the applicant as at 11 October 2021.

  9. The applicant has now provided the statement sought by the delegate, from an appropriate authority, and therefore meets reg 2.03AA(2)(a).

    Conclusion

  10. There is no evidence that the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a completed approved Form 80, therefore the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(b) does not apply.

  11. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets reg 2.03AA(2).

    DECISION

  12. The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

    Denise Connolly
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0