Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Rosecorp v Canada Bay [2005] NSWLEC 218
PARTIES: Applicant:
Rosecorp Management Services Pty LtdRespondent:
Canada Bay City CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10138 and; 10139 of 2005
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Contaminated Land :-
DATES OF HEARING: 03/05/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 05/03/2005
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Applicant:
Respondent:
Ms S Duggan, barrister
Ms I Ferguson, solicitor
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
3 May 2005
10138 of 2005 and
10139 of 2005 Rosecorp Management Services Pty Ltd v Canada Bay City council
The consequence of the Court’s decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. The conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but are available for inspection at the Council. A copy the Court’s Orders and conditions may be obtained from the Court’s registry on payment of a fee. For details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions see the Court’s web site atJUDGMENT
1 Senior Commissioner: The dispute between the parties in these appeals related the breach of a condition of consent that required that construction does not occur below a certain RL on a contaminated part of the site. The applicant has constructed piles that breach the condition. At a case management meeting, however, the parties reached an agreement on a system of monitoring that satisfied both parties. Since the parties had agreed, the matter did not need to proceed to a hearing. The Court agreed that the parties had found a reasonable solution to the dispute and acceded to the request for consent orders.
Orders
For Appeal No 10138 of 2005
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 318/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
For Appeal No 10139: of 2005
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 317/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
_______________________
John Roseth
Senior Commissioner
- AGLC
- Rosecorp v Canada Bay [2005] NSWLEC 218
- Case
- [2005] NSWLEC 218
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court included whether the applicant's construction breached the condition of consent, and if the proposed monitoring system was a reasonable solution to the dispute. The Court considered the evidence provided by both parties and found that the proposed monitoring system was an acceptable solution to the dispute. The Court was satisfied that the parties had reached a reasonable agreement and that the applicant's appeal should be upheld.
The Court granted the applicant's appeal and approved the section 96 application to amend the development consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. The Court found that the proposed monitoring system was a reasonable solution to the dispute and that the applicant's construction did not breach the condition of consent. The Court also noted that the conditions were available for inspection at the Council and that a copy of the Orders and conditions could be obtained from the Court's registry on payment of a fee.
In conclusion, the Court granted the applicant's appeal and approved the section 96 application to amend the development consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. The Court found that the proposed monitoring system was a reasonable solution to the dispute and that the applicant's construction did not breach the condition of consent. The Court's decision was based on the evidence provided by both parties and the agreement reached during the case management meeting.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.