Rosecorp v Canada Bay

Case

[2005] NSWLEC 218

05/03/2005

No judgment structure available for this case.


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION:

Rosecorp v Canada Bay [2005] NSWLEC 218

PARTIES:

Applicant:
Rosecorp Management Services Pty Ltd

Respondent:
Canada Bay City Council

FILE NUMBER(S):

10138 and; 10139 of 2005

CORAM:

Roseth SC

KEY ISSUES:

Contaminated Land :-

DATES OF HEARING: 03/05/2005
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE:

05/03/2005

LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

Applicant:
Ms S Duggan, barrister

Respondent:
Ms I Ferguson, solicitor


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Roseth SC

      3 May 2005

      10138 of 2005 and
      10139 of 2005 Rosecorp Management Services Pty Ltd v Canada Bay City council

      JUDGMENT

      The consequence of the Court’s decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. The conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but are available for inspection at the Council. A copy the Court’s Orders and conditions may be obtained from the Court’s registry on payment of a fee. For details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions see the Court’s web site at

1 Senior Commissioner: The dispute between the parties in these appeals related the breach of a condition of consent that required that construction does not occur below a certain RL on a contaminated part of the site. The applicant has constructed piles that breach the condition. At a case management meeting, however, the parties reached an agreement on a system of monitoring that satisfied both parties. Since the parties had agreed, the matter did not need to proceed to a hearing. The Court agreed that the parties had found a reasonable solution to the dispute and acceded to the request for consent orders.


      Orders
      For Appeal No 10138 of 2005

1. The appeal is upheld.

2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 318/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.


      For Appeal No 10139: of 2005

1. The appeal is upheld.

2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 317/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.


      _______________________
      John Roseth
      Senior Commissioner
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0