Rose v Tunstall
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 241
•25 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rose v Tunstall [2018] NSWCA 241
[2018] NSWCA 241
25 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this matter were Rose (appellant) and Tunstall (respondent). The dispute concerned an appeal from a decision of the Local Court. The appeal was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether it had the power to make findings of fact on an appeal from the Local Court, particularly in circumstances where the appeal was brought pursuant to sections 39 and 41 of the *Local Court Act 2007*. A secondary issue arose concerning an application for leave to appeal, which was made because the amount in dispute fell below the statutory threshold for an appeal as of right under section 101 of the *Supreme Court Act 1970*.
The Court determined that it did not have the power to make new findings of fact on appeal from the Local Court. The Court also refused leave to appeal, finding that the case did not raise an issue of principle, a question of general importance, or a reasonably clear injustice. Consequently, leave to cross-appeal was also refused.
The Court made no order as to costs in the Supreme Court.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether it had the power to make findings of fact on an appeal from the Local Court, particularly in circumstances where the appeal was brought pursuant to sections 39 and 41 of the *Local Court Act 2007*. A secondary issue arose concerning an application for leave to appeal, which was made because the amount in dispute fell below the statutory threshold for an appeal as of right under section 101 of the *Supreme Court Act 1970*.
The Court determined that it did not have the power to make new findings of fact on appeal from the Local Court. The Court also refused leave to appeal, finding that the case did not raise an issue of principle, a question of general importance, or a reasonably clear injustice. Consequently, leave to cross-appeal was also refused.
The Court made no order as to costs in the Supreme Court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Rose v Tunstall [2018] NSWCA 241
Most Recent Citation
Taouk v Ho [2018] NSWSC 1854
Cases Citing This Decision
26
Rahme v Kekatos Lawyers Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWCA 31
Drive My Car Rentals Pty Ltd v Gabriel
[2021] NSWCA 73
Bundarrah Pty Ltd v Schmahl
[2025] NSWSC 1201
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
6
Lesley-Swan v Owners SP 32735
[2013] NSWSC 1635
World Avenue Pty Ltd v Tsunashima
[2013] NSWSC 502
B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2008] NSWCA 187