Legal Research
Cases
Rose v Frankston City Council

Rose v Frankston City Council

Case [2013] VCC 429

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Rose v Frankston City Council [2012] VCC 429
Case: [2013] VCC 429
Decision Date: 1 May 2013 (Revised)

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Rose v Frankston City Council [2012] VCC 429

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97
Citation 1

…orr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 3) [2012] VSC 529; Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97 JUDGMENT: The first defendant have judgment in the proceeding brought against it by the plaintiff pursuant to s62 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010.…
Worldwide Enterprises Pty Ltd v Silberman [2010] VSCA 17
Citation 2

…LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2010, s62, r 1.17(1) and r 9.06 CASES CITED: Worldwide Enterprises Pty Ltd v Silberman & Anor (2010) 26 VR 595; Ottedin Investments Pty Ltd v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 222; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors [2…
Knorr v CSIRO (No 3) [2012] VSC 529
Citation 3

…sation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 2) [2012] VSC 268; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 3) [2012] VSC 529; Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97 JUDGMENT: The first defendant have judgment in the proceeding brought against it by the plaintiff pursuant to s62 of th…
Knorr v CSIRO & Ors (No 2) [2012] VSC 268
Citation 4

…h Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors [2012] VSC 83; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 2) [2012] VSC 268; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 3) [2012] VSC 529; Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97 JUDGMENT: The…
Knorr v CSIRO & Ors [2012] VSC 83
Citation 5

…v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 222; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors [2012] VSC 83; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors (No 2) [2012] VSC 268; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Or…
Ottedin Investments Pty Ltd v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 222
Citation 6

…ED: Worldwide Enterprises Pty Ltd v Silberman & Anor (2010) 26 VR 595; Ottedin Investments Pty Ltd v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 222; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) & Ors [2012] VSC 83; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisati…
Worldwide Enterprises Pty Ltd v Silberman & Anor [2008] VSC 418
Citation 7

…pect of a fair trial on the plaintiff’s pleadings LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2010, s62, r 1.17(1) and r 9.06 CASES CITED: Worldwide Enterprises Pty Ltd v Silberman & Anor (2010) 26 VR 595; Ottedin Investments Pty Ltd v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 222; Knorr v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO…

AI Chat coming soon