Ronald Trevor Gallaty v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

RONALD TREVOR GALLATY

v

THE QUEEN

[2021] HCASL 223
B30/2021

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland, which dismissed the applicant's appeal against conviction for one count of dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death contrary to s 328A(4) of the Criminal Code (Qld).

  2. The proposed appeal has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave.

  3. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.S. Gleeson
11 November 2021
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Ronald Trevor Gallaty v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] HCASL 223
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ronald Trevor Gallaty sought special leave to appeal against his conviction and sentence for dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death. The Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland dismissed his appeal against conviction for one count of the offence contrary to section 328A(4) of the Criminal Code (Qld). The applicant sought special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia, arguing that the decision of the Court of Appeal contained errors of law.

The High Court was required to determine whether the applicant's proposed appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The Court considered the grounds of appeal, the arguments presented by the applicant, and the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. The Court also considered the relevant legal principles and authorities.

The High Court held that the applicant's proposed appeal had insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The Court found that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the law and that the applicant's arguments did not raise any significant questions of law of general public importance. The Court also noted that the applicant's conviction and sentence were consistent with those imposed in similar cases.

Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal. The Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision is final and binding on the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.