Roma Hotel Pty Ltd T/A Hotel Jen Brisbane

Case [2019] FWCA 755


[2019] FWCA 755
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Roma Hotel Pty Ltd T/A Hotel Jen Brisbane
(AG2019/77)

HOTEL JEN ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Hospitality industry

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER

SYDNEY, 7 FEBRUARY 2019

Application for termination of the Hotel Jen Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] On 14 January 2019, Roma Hotel Pty Ltd t/a Hotel Jen Brisbane applied for the termination of the Hotel Jen Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.

[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.

[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE412599  PR704664>

Details
AGLC
Roma Hotel Pty Ltd T/A Hotel Jen Brisbane [2019] FWCA 755
Case
[2019] FWCA 755
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Roma Hotel Pty Ltd trading as Hotel Jen Brisbane, who applied for the termination of the Hotel Jen Enterprise Agreement 2015. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission. The primary dispute arose from the hotel's contention that the enterprise agreement was no longer suitable for the business's needs, necessitating a termination to allow for more adaptable and contemporary employment terms.

The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the enterprise agreement could be terminated under the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the application met the criteria for termination and whether the termination would result in a less disadvantageous outcome for the employees involved. The hotel argued that changes in the hospitality industry and internal business restructuring required more flexible employment terms, which were not possible under the existing agreement.

The Fair Work Commission evaluated the application based on the statutory provisions and relevant case law. The Commission found that the hotel had demonstrated a significant change in business circumstances that warranted the termination of the agreement. The Commission also considered the potential impact on employees, ensuring that the termination would not lead to a less advantageous outcome for them. Ultimately, the Commission upheld the application for termination, allowing the parties to negotiate a new enterprise agreement that better suited the current business environment. The Commission's decision was based on the hotel's evidence of substantial changes in its operations and the necessity for updated employment terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.