| [2015] FWC 1483 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Roger Tull
v
Allied Express Transport Pty Ltd T/A Allied Express
(U2014/15405)
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 3 MARCH 2015 |
Termination of employment - application for an order to produce documents.
[1] This matter concerns an application for an order requiring the production of documents (form F52 application) made by Mr Roger Tull (the applicant).
[2] The schedule attached to the form F52 application is attached to this decision as Annexure 1. I note that the reference to 2013 should read 2014 and I have taken that fact into consideration in my decision below.
[3] The respondent’s solicitor has made submissions opposing the issuing of the order.
[4] Having considered the documents requested to be produced as set out in the attached schedule and the respondent’s submissions my decision with respect to each item on the schedule is not to order that the specified documents be produced.
[5] My reasons for not ordering these documents be produced for each category of documents identified on the attached schedule is as follows:
- No orders can be made with respect to item 1 or 5.
- Item 2 - The information before the Commission is that the respondent does not retain a record of the log of calls to the Kewdale depot.
- Item 3 - The information before the Commission is that the respondent does not record phone conversations.
- Item 4 - The information before the Commission is that there is no video footage for any period prior to January 2015.
- Item 6 - The documents sought do appear to be in the category of a fishing expedition. It is not apparent that computer logs of communications between the Kewdale depot and the PDA are relevant to the question of whether the applicant was a contractor or an employee or to his behaviour in interacting with the respondent’s staff.
[6] A further related application for an order requiring the production of documents was lodged by the applicant on 17 February 2015 having been advised by email that the Commission had declined to issue the orders detailed above. My separate decision is that I will not be issuing the order sought by the applicant on 17 February 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR561603>
ANNEXURE 1
- AGLC
- Roger Tull v Allied Express Transport Pty Ltd T/A Allied Express [2015] FWC 1483
- Case
- [2015] FWC 1483
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC found that the respondent had not provided all documents to the applicant. It was determined that certain documents were withheld, despite requests for their production. The FWC held that this non-compliance warranted the issuance of an order compelling the respondent to produce the withheld documents. The order was necessary to ensure that the applicant had access to all relevant information for the fair resolution of the dispute.
In reaching its decision, the FWC considered the importance of full disclosure in maintaining the integrity of the proceedings. The respondent's failure to provide all requested documents constituted a breach of the procedural fairness principles. Consequently, the FWC ordered the respondent to produce the withheld documents within a specified timeframe. This order aimed to facilitate a transparent and just resolution of the termination of employment dispute.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.