Rogala v Markou
[1984] FCA 488
•18 Sep 1984
. .
| . . . . | . . |
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | ) ) |
| WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) | No. W.A.G. 62 OF 1984 |
)
| GENERAL DIVISION | ) |
| On Appeal | from the Decis'ion of |
| Mr. Justice | Toohep | on | the |
Appellant's (Third Respondent's) Notice of Motion dated the 18th
| of June, 1984 in Action No. | 52 |
| of 1983 |
| "(i) All | documents | relating | tohe |
Applicants' personal financial affairs
| including | all | cheque butts, | Bank |
statements, Savings and other accounts
2.
| operated by them | or either of them |
| from the 1st of | July 1983. |
(ii) All documents relating to any Bankcard
| . ' | or other credit card operated by the | |
| ||
|
| of S . 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. | The action arises |
| because of alleged misrepresentations made by | or on behalf of |
the respondents in relation to the returns received by the third respondent from the business of carrying on a video library. The applicants purchased the business and carried it on between 20 August 1983 and 7 October 1983. Their case
| is that the representations | as to takings and | as to expected |
| profits were not fulfilled and | that | they were induced to |
| ./ | J |
| . | . |
| . | . |
. . .
. .
3.
purchase the business by the representations referred to.
The respondents admit makina some of the representations but
say that they were not false. the applicants' assertions to
the contrary being denied in their defence.
| The documents which were sought by the notice | f motion |
| were sought, according to counsel | f o r | the appellants, in |
| order to assist the appellants to assess | ' whether or not the |
applicants may not have received moneys from the business
during the period they carried it on additional to those
| which they concede they received. If that were to be | shown, |
| the | applicants' | case | would | be | damaged | in | an important |
respect.
| Argument proceeded this morning until counsel | for the |
| respondents to the appeal, that is | the applicants | , in the | .: .., '. .' | ' |
| . . | ~ | . |
| . , | . |
| principal proceedings, conceded, at | least': as' a secondary or |
| fall-back position, that some of the documents. discovery | of |
| which was sought, would have been relevant to the issues | if |
| they had been sought in respect of the period during whiih | . . |
| the business was carried on by the respondents | to he appea=l, |
| that is, 20 August 1983 to | 7 October 1983. | He, at that |
stage, would not countenance production of documents prior to
2 0 August 1983. However, during discussions which took place
| at | our | suggestion the parties have reached agreement on |
documents which should be produced with the consequence that
the appeal should by consent be allowed in part. That
agreement involves the generality of para (i) being cut out,
| the period specified therein becoming | 1 | July 1983 to | 7 |
| . | . |
4.
| October 1983 | and similar periods being specified in paras. |
| (ii) and (iii). The taxation returns sought | in para. (iv) |
are not sought upon the basis, no doubt, that they could not
be relevant.
Discussion has taken place as to what the order for
| .( | costs ought to be and we have expressed | the view | that the |
| costs | of | the' | -appeal | should | be costs | in | the | principal |
proceedings.
| In | the light of | the | foregoing, the orders which the |
| court makes are | as follows:- |
| (1) | The appeal be allowed. |
. .
. .
| . . | ~. | . | ... . |
| ( 2 ) | Paragraph 1 of the order made | . .on 13 | ' . | . . | . . L . | . . |
| ,. | , | , . . | . | . |
. . .
| July 1984 which dismissed. &e | notice | .~ | . . |
. ~ . . .
of motion in so far as it-sought'the
| orders in paras. l(a) (i) to | ,(iv) |
i
| - . . | , - |
| inclusive be set aside and in lieu | - , . | |||
| ||||
|
| thereof | there | be | substituted | the |
following:
| The applicants | do, within seven |
days from the date hereof, give
discovery on oath of the following
documents or classes of documents
in their possession, custody or
power :
| ( i) | all | cheque | butts, | bank |
i
| ( 3 ) | The costs of the | appeal | be | costs | in |
| the proceedings. |
The Court notes the agreement of the parties that until
| further | order | inspection | of the | documents is limited to |
| . | . ,... | . |
| . . |
6.
counsel and solicitors for the appellants.
.
0
0
0