Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rofail v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1162 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 March 2018 and 29 March 2018 Date of orders: 29 March 2018 Decision date: 29 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Boulos Rofail (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Katharine Huxley, McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Mark Bonano, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/00332974 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to development application no. 10.2017.081.1 for the demolition of existing building and construction of 4 storey boarding house with landscaping and basement carpark at Lot 1, DP 1007091 (No. 185) Norton Street, Ashfield NSW by the granting of conditional development consent subject to the conditions contained in Annexure ‘A’.
……………………….
Susan Dixon
Senior Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court
Annexure A (379 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Rofail v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1162
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to this case revolved around whether the council had acted within its statutory powers when it rejected Mr Rofail's development application, and if the reasons provided by the council for the refusal were legally sound and supported by the evidence. Specifically, the court had to examine the compliance of the proposed development with the planning scheme, the adequacy of the council's reasons for refusal, and whether there were any procedural irregularities in the decision-making process.
The court found that the council's decision to deny the development permit was not supported by the evidence and that the reasons provided were insufficient. The court concluded that the council had not correctly interpreted the relevant provisions of the planning scheme and had failed to properly consider the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding area. As a result, the court set aside the council's decision and ordered the council to approve the development application, subject to certain conditions. The council was also directed to pay costs to Mr Rofail.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.