Rodgers & Pisani

Case [2007] FamCA 1510


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

RODGERS & PISANI [2007] FamCA 1510
FAMILY LAW - SECURITY FOR COSTS – Application by the wife for security for costs in relation to an appeal instituted by the husband – Application dismissed.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) – s 117
Sawer and Sawer [2007] FamCA 140
Beaumont and Cross (Security for Costs) [2007] FamCA 1129
Simpson and McGuren (2005) FLC 93,223
Jones and Jones (2001) FLC 93-080
Gronow v Gronow (1979) FLC 90-716
McAlpin and McAlpin (1993) FLC 92-411
Luadaka v Luadaka (1998) FLC 92-830; 24 Fam LR 340
APPLICANT: Ms Rodgers
RESPONDENT: Mr Pisani
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Melanie Robb
FILE NUMBER: MLF 3306 of 2004
APPEAL NUMBER: EA 78 of 2006

DATE DELIVERED:

20 December 2007
PLACE DELIVERED: Canberra
JUDGMENT OF: Bryant CJ, Finn & Mullane JJ
HEARING DATE: 4 October 2007
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Family Court of Australia
LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATES: 20 June 2006
LOWER COURT MNC: [2006] FamCA 536

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Wearne
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Legal Aid Commission NSW
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Watkins
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT

CHILDREN’S LAWYER:

Mr Harper

SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT

CHILDREN’S LAWYER:

Robb & Associates

Orders

  1. That the application for security for costs filed on behalf of the wife on 19 December 2006 be dismissed.

  2. That the costs of and incidental to the application referred to in Order 1 of these orders be reserved as costs in the appeal of the husband against the orders made by the Honourable Justice Carter on 20 June 2006.

IT IS NOTED IN CONNECTION WITH THESE ORDERS that the judgment of the Full Court delivered this day will for all publication and reporting purposes be referred to as Rodgers & Pisani.

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

Appeal Number: EA 78 of 2006
File Number: MLF 2206 of 2004

Ms Rodgers

Applicant

And

Mr Pisani

Respondent

And

Melanie Robb

Independent Children’s Lawyer

Reasons for Judgment

Bryant CJ and Finn J:

  1. This is an application by the wife, Ms Rodgers, (filed on her behalf by a solicitor with the New South Wales Legal Aid Commission) seeking orders that the husband, Mr Pisani, be required to lodge security in the sum of $3,458.65 for the costs which might be incurred on the wife’s behalf in relation to an appeal which the husband has instituted against parenting orders made by Carter J on 20 June 2006.

Background

  1. Her Honour’s orders of 20 June 2006, which were made after a six day hearing in February and March 2006, provided that the three children of the marriage of the husband and the wife should reside with the wife, but that they would have contact with the husband from Friday afternoon to Tuesday morning each alternate weekend and from Monday afternoon to Tuesday morning in the alternate week (that is, five nights in each fortnight) and for half the school holidays.

  2. On 20 June 2006 Carter J also delivered lengthy reasons in relation to her…

Continue reading Rodgers & Pisani

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Rodgers & Pisani [2007] FamCA 1510
Case
[2007] FamCA 1510
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties in this matter were the husband and the wife, who were engaged in an appeal concerning orders made by Justice Carter on 20 June 2006. The wife had filed an application for security for costs on 19 December 2006.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application for security for costs should be granted.

The court dismissed the wife's application for security for costs. The costs associated with this application were reserved and will be determined as part of the costs of the husband's appeal against the original orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the application for security for costs filed on behalf of the wife on 19 December 2006 be dismissed.

2.

That the costs of and incidental to the application referred to in Order 1 of these orders be reserved as costs in the appeal of the husband against the orders made by the Honourable Justice Carter on 20 June 2006.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.