Rochford v Dayes
[1989] HCATrans 228
•
•
~
•
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S33 of 1989 B e t w e e n -
DENNIS ANTHONY ROCHFORD
Appellant
and
EDWARD DAYES
First Respondent
GEORGE ARCHER
Second Respondent
NORTH QUEENSLAND BACON CO PTY
LIMITED
Third Respondent
Objection to Competency of Appeal
| Rochford(2) |
J:vfASON CJ
DEANE J
McHUGH J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 13 OCTOBER 1989, AT 12.54PM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| SlT 8/1/DR | 1 | 13/10/89 |
| MR A.R. ASHBURNER: | May it please the Court, I appear |
for the applicant in the motion being respondents
to the appeal. (instructed by Hunt & Hunt)
| MR B. MOORE: | May it please the Court, I appear for |
Mr Rochford, the appellant in responding to the
notice of motion. (of Martin-.-.&·-Melville)
| MR ASHBURNER: | Your Honours, that matter has been settled. |
Would Your Honours, by consent, order that the
appeal be dismissed and order the appellant to
pay the respondent's cost, both of the appeal and
of the application.
| MASON CJ: | By consent, there will be orders in those terms. |
AT 12.55 PM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| SlT8/2/DR | 13/10/89 |
| Rochford(2) |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Costs
-
Appeal
0
0
0