Rochford v Dayes

Case

[1989] HCATrans 228

No judgment structure available for this case.

~

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Sydney No S33 of 1989

B e t w e e n -

DENNIS ANTHONY ROCHFORD

Appellant

and

EDWARD DAYES

First Respondent

GEORGE ARCHER

Second Respondent

NORTH QUEENSLAND BACON CO PTY

LIMITED

Third Respondent

Objection to Competency of Appeal

Rochford(2)

J:vfASON CJ
DEANE J

McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 13 OCTOBER 1989, AT 12.54PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

SlT 8/1/DR 1 13/10/89
MR A.R. ASHBURNER:  May it please the Court, I appear

for the applicant in the motion being respondents

to the appeal. (instructed by Hunt & Hunt)
MR B. MOORE:  May it please the Court, I appear for

Mr Rochford, the appellant in responding to the

notice of motion. (of Martin-.-.&·-Melville)

MR ASHBURNER:  Your Honours, that matter has been settled.

Would Your Honours, by consent, order that the

appeal be dismissed and order the appellant to

pay the respondent's cost, both of the appeal and

of the application.

MASON CJ:  By consent, there will be orders in those terms.

AT 12.55 PM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

SlT8/2/DR 13/10/89
Rochford(2)

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Consent

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0