Robust Builders Pty Ltd v Barai & Anor (No.6)

Link copied
Case Copied 77 min read

District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Robust Builders Pty Ltd v Barai & Anor (No.6) [2023] NSWDC 376
Hearing dates: 22-25, 28-31 August 2023; 1, 5 - 7 September 2023
Date of orders: 15 September 2023
Decision date: 15 September 2023
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Abadee DCJ
Decision:

See paragraph 363

Catchwords:

CONTRACTS – building and engineering contracts - – builders’ claim for unpaid invoices – question of date the contract was entered – whether collateral contract – whether owners liable for unpaid invoices – whether claimed variations proven - owners’ cross-claim for defective and incomplete works – significance of issue of occupancy certificate and other compliance reports to proof of defective or incomplete works – significance of rectification order

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 96,100

Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 69

Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 7, 10, 11, 18B, 18E, 18BA, 18G, 48E, 48F, 48K, 48L, 51

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.20, 14.14, 42.1

Cases Cited:

Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570

Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household & Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd (2000) 201 CLR 520

Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell (2000) 75 ALJR 312

Crown Melbourne Ltd v Cosmpolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd (2016) 260 CLR 1

Hoyt’s Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133

L'Estrange v Graucob Ltd (1934) 2 KB 394

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560:

Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan’s Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93

Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165

Texts Cited:

N Seddon and R Bigwood, Cheshire & Fifoot The Law of Contract (11th Australian ed, LexisNexis 2017)

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Robust Builders Pty Ltd (plaintiff/cross-defendant)
Mr P Barai (defendant/cross-claimant 1)
Mrs F Mahjabeen (defendant/cross-claimant 2)
Representation: Mr D Lambley (solicitor) for the defendants/cross-claimant
Mr R Mehndiratta (as director of and for the plaintiff/cross-defendant)
File Number(s): 2018/00259451

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

The parties’ cases

Issues

The evidence relied upon by the parties

issues associated with the builder’s claim

The date the contract was entered

The Builder’s evidence

The Owners’ evidence

Mr Barai

Ms Mahjabeen

Expert evidence

Submissions

The Builder’s submissions

The Owners’ submissions

The builders’ submissions in reply

Consideration

Credit

Mr Mehndiratta

Mr Barai

Ms Mahjabeen

Forensic consequences of credit findings

Analysis

When the contract was entered into & entry into collateral agreement

Was there a cap on claims for variations?

Summary

The claim for unpaid invoices

The Builder’s evidence

The invoices the subject of the claim

Other documents

The Owners’ evidence

Mr Barai’s evidence

Mr Barai’s position in relation to the invoices he says were received

Mr Barai’s position with respect to the invoices he says he did not receive

Features of Mr Barai’s cross-examination

Ms Mahjabeen

Submissions

The Builder’s submissions

The owners’ submissions

Consideration

Claim in restitution for works performed

The claim in detinue for items not returned to the Builder

The…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Robust Builders Pty Ltd v Barai & Anor (No.6) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWDC 376
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Robust Builders Pty Ltd sought to recover unpaid invoices from Barai and another party, on the basis that the invoices related to work performed under a building contract. Barai and the other party denied liability, claiming that the contract had not been entered into on the date alleged by Robust Builders, that any contract was subject to a collateral agreement, and that the works performed were defective and incomplete. The dispute came before the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court was required to determine whether a contract had been entered into on the date alleged, whether there was a collateral contract, whether Barai and the other party were liable for the invoices, whether the claimed variations were proven, and whether Barai and the other party were liable for defective and incomplete works. The court found that a contract had been entered into on the date alleged, that there was no collateral contract, and that Barai and the other party were liable for the invoices. The court found that the claimed variations were not proven, and that Barai and the other party were not liable for defective and incomplete works. The issue of the occupancy certificate and other compliance reports were relevant to the proof of defective or incomplete works, but the court found that the rectification order did not establish liability for defective or incomplete works. The orders made by the court included a determination that Barai and the other party were liable for the unpaid invoices, and that Barai and the other party were not liable for defective and incomplete works.

Orders

Orders of the court

See paragraph 363

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.