Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
5
-
Guo and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (Migration)
[2016] AATA 901
Citation 1
(Para 20)
…aw, having regard by analogy to the matters (non-exhaustively) listed in s 138(3) of the Evidence Act, which we understand in so far as is relevant ( Robinson v Woolworths (2005) 64 NSWLR 612 per Basten J at [16]-[20]) was not intended to do anything other than reflect the common law but to clarify that it extended to civil pr…
-
R v Alan Winston Priest
[2011] ACTSC 18
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…Robinson v Woolworths (2005) 64 NSWLR 612 ( Woolworths ) arose from random “testing” of retailers for their willingness to supply cigarettes to children. Woolworths was prosecuted in the Magistrates Court and convicted of supplying cigarettes to minors. Woolworths’ appeal was upheld in the District Court and there was a furthe…
-
R v Harold Scott Upton
[2007] ACTSC 21
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…The conduct here in question seems to me to equate closely with the conduct considered by the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal in Robinson v Woolworths (2005) 64 NSWLR 612. In that case the court considered a program of “compliance testing” whereby relevant health authorities recruited young persons who entered premise…
-
R v Aujla
[2012] VSC 213
Citation 4
…t/early morning of the crime alleged. [2] Higgins v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 56 at [26]. [3]See for example The Queen v Tang [2010] VSC 578. [4] Robinson v Woolworths (2005) A Crim R 546; R (C’th) v Petradias (No 8) (2007) A Crim R 417. [5] Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54.…
-
Jovanovic v Berkeley Challenge
[2021] VMC 2
Citation 5
(Para 39)
…and any other explanation for the failure to raise the claim previously should be considered. [4] Outline of Plaintiff’s Submissions at [39] [5] [2015] VMC 33 at [11]…
Statutory Material Cited
0