ROBINSON
v
ROBINSON & ORS[2020] HCASL 116
S39/2020
The application for special leave to appeal raises no reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Hence it would be futile to grant an extension of time. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M Bell S.J Gageler 24 April 2020
Details
- AGLC
- Robinson v Robinson [2020] HCASL 116
- Case
- [2020] HCASL 116
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties involved in this case were Robinson and another person, with the case being heard in the High Court of Australia. The nature of the dispute involved an application for special leave to appeal a decision made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The legal issues the court was required to decide involved whether the application for special leave to appeal raised a reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, and whether it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
The court considered the application for special leave to appeal and found that it raised no reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court also found that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. Therefore, the court decided that special leave should be refused. The court's reasoning was based on the fact that the application for special leave to appeal did not provide any reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
In conclusion, the High Court of Australia refused the application for special leave to appeal and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision was made on 24 April 2020, and was signed by V.M Bell and S.J Gageler. The court found that the application did not raise a reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
The court considered the application for special leave to appeal and found that it raised no reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court also found that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. Therefore, the court decided that special leave should be refused. The court's reasoning was based on the fact that the application for special leave to appeal did not provide any reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
In conclusion, the High Court of Australia refused the application for special leave to appeal and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision was made on 24 April 2020, and was signed by V.M Bell and S.J Gageler. The court found that the application did not raise a reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.