Robert Solin v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 82 min read
[2017] FWC 2584
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Robert Solin
v
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
(U2016/13206)

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 22 MAY 2017

Termination of employment.

[1] This decision concerns an unfair dismissal remedy application made by Mr Robert Solin (Mr Solin or the Applicant) under section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The respondent is Chevron Australia Pty Ltd (Chevron or the Respondent).

Evidence

[2] The parties have submitted a statement of agreed facts which I accept.

[3] For the purposes of this proceeding only, the Applicant and the Respondent agree as follows.

[4] The Respondent is the operator of the Gorgon Liquefied Natural Gas Project on Barrow Island (BWI) in Western Australia (Gorgon Project).

[5] Pursuant to an employment contract dated 2 August 2013, the Applicant initially commenced employment with the Respondent on 2 September 2013 in the position of Production Technician - Pay Salary Grade 18 based in Perth in the Respondent’s Gorgon Operations department.

[6] On 23 July 2014, the Applicant entered into a new contract of employment with the Respondent in the position of Production Technician - Pay Salary Grade 18 in the Respondent’s Gorgon Operations department pursuant to which the Applicant would mobilise to the Gorgon Project on a rotational basis (2014 Contract).

[7] The 2014 Contract relevantly states that:

    “The Company has policies and procedures which have been made accessible to all employees. You will be required to familiarise yourself with and comply with such policies and procedures as amended by the Company in its sole discretion from time to time. The Company's policies and procedures do not form part of your contract of employment and are not binding on the Company.”

[8] The Applicant commenced work on BWI on 6 August 2014 on a Ten Week Roster.

[9] At the date of his dismissal, the Applicant was a senior employee on the Gorgon Project, and he received a total remuneration package of $193,546 (gross), comprised of the following components:

    (a) Base salary: $107,300;

    (b) Field loading: $55,000;

    (c) Travel allowance: $1,668;

    (d) Various non-cash benefits, including:

      (i) Chevron Employee Share Plan: $2,146;

      (ii) Superannuation: $17,168;

      (iii) Superannuation administration fees: $487;

      (iv) Group Life Insurance: $1,193; and

    (e) At-risk bonus (to be paid in April 2017 based on performance): up to $8,584.

[10] Two of the Respondent’s key policies are the ‘Chevron Way’ and the ‘Business Conduct and Ethics Code’. These policies articulate the Respondent’s values and establish the standard of conduct with which it expects all of its employees to conduct themselves. These policies place the highest priority on the health, safety and diversity of the Respondent’s workforce.

[11] The Chevron Way relevantly provides that:

    “Values

    Our company’s foundation is built on our values, which distinguish us and guide our actions. We conduct our business in a socially responsible and ethical manner. We respect the law, support universal human rights, protect the environment and benefit the communities where we work.

    Integrity

    We…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Robert Solin v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] FWC 2584
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Robert Solin initiated legal proceedings against Chevron Australia Pty Ltd, alleging wrongful termination of his employment. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The central dispute revolved around the fairness of Mr Solin's dismissal, with particular emphasis on whether the termination was justified, procedurally fair, and in line with the applicable employment laws.

The primary legal issues the Commission was tasked with resolving included whether Mr Solin's dismissal was for a valid reason, whether the process leading to the termination was fair, and whether the employer had acted in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if there were any mitigating circumstances that could influence the assessment of the dismissal's fairness.

The Fair Work Commission deliberated on the evidence presented, including the circumstances surrounding Mr Solin's employment, the reasons for his termination, and the procedural steps taken by Chevron Australia. The Commission found that Mr Solin's dismissal was not justified, as the employer failed to provide adequate evidence to support the termination. Furthermore, the process leading to the dismissal was deemed procedurally unfair. Consequently, the Commission ruled that the termination was unlawful and ordered Chevron Australia to reinstate Mr Solin to his former position and compensate him for lost earnings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.