[2013] AATA 277
Division Veterans' Appeals Division File Numbers
2012/3535
2012/4499
Re
Robert Mewett
APPLICANT
And
Repatriation Commission
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member Bernard J McCabe
Date 8 May 2013 Place Brisbane (heard in Townsville) The decision under review related to depressive disorder is set aside and varied. The decision under review related to ischaemic heart disease is affirmed.
............................[Sgd]............................................
Senior Member Bernard J McCabe
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS' AFFAIRS – Pensions and benefits – Pension at special rate – Date of onset of depressive disorder – Ischaemic heart disease – Category 1A stressor – Decision related to depressive disorder set aside and substituted – Decision related to ischaemic heart disease affirmed
LEGISLATION
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
SECONDARY MATERIALS
Statement of Principles, No. 28 of 2008
Statement of Principles, No 90 of 2007
REASONS FOR DECISION
Senior Member Bernard J McCabe
Robert Mewett suffers from a depressive disorder and a heart condition. He says those conditions are a result of his work as a bomb disposal technician while serving in the RAAF between 1981 and 2006. He has asked for a pension paid at the special rate under s 24 of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The hearing which has led to this decision focused on whether it was possible to establish a link between the conditions and the applicant’s defence service.
In order to succeed in his claim for depressive disorder, Mr Mewett must satisfy the requirements imposed by the applicable Statement of Principles (SoP) published by the Repatriation Medical Authority, No. 28 of 2008. As a practical matter, that means he must establish he was exposed to a category 1A, category 1B, or category 2 stressor in the two-year period before the onset of his depressive condition. To succeed in his claim for ischaemic heart disease, he must satisfy the requirements of the SoP applicable to that condition, which is No. 90 of 2007. The applicant can satisfy the requirements of that SoP if he can establish his depressive disorder:
(a) was defence-caused, and
(b) the depressive condition had a date of onset prior to early 2001. (Factor 6(m) in the ischaemic heart disease SoP refers to the presence of a clinically significant psychiatric disorder for at least 5 years before the date of onset of the heart condition.)
The applicant provided a good deal of evidence about his experience as a bomb-disposal technician. He had difficulty remembering some events. His recollection of dates and the detail of some specific events was especially vague. Even so, I am satisfied he was doing his best to assist the Tribunal. I accept he was a credible witness and I have no reason to doubt what he said at the hearing or in his statements. I accept his evidence.
Mr Mewett told a number of stories about hair-raising experiences he had as a bomb-disposal technician. He was routinely required to handle unexploded munitions. That often occurred in a controlled environment which limited the risk – although Mr Mewett told stories about how…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Robert Mewett and Repatriation Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] AATA 277
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of evidence and the application of statutory criteria to determine the onset and causation of Mewett's health conditions. The court needed to assess the medical evidence presented, particularly the testimony of Professor Baune, and decide whether Mewett's depression could be diagnosed as early as 1998 or 1999. Additionally, the court had to examine whether the ischaemic heart disease was linked to Mewett's service.
In its reasoning, the court expressed that while Professor Baune suggested the possibility of Mewett suffering from depression as early as 1998 or 1999, the evidence was not conclusive enough to support such a diagnosis at that time. The court emphasised that while it did not disrespect Professor Baune's opinion, determining the exact onset of depression was not typically a concern for a treating doctor. The court also noted that Professor Baune's testimony lacked the conviction necessary to establish a definitive diagnosis in the specified years, even if some symptoms were emerging. Consequently, the court was unable to draw a firm conclusion about the onset of Mewett's depression. However, the court affirmed that Mewett's ischaemic heart disease was related to his service.
The court set aside the decision concerning the depressive disorder and remitted the question of assessment to the Repatriation Commission for further consideration. It affirmed the decision regarding the ischaemic heart disease, maintaining that it was related to Mewett's defence service. The court's final orders thus involved a reconsideration of the depressive disorder's onset and its relation to Mewett's service, while upholding the existing decision on the ischaemic heart disease.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.