| [2022] FWCA 3238 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical
(AG2022/3540)
Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2026
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER SPENCER | BRISBANE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2026
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2026 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Subject to matters that have been addressed by way of an undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted an undertaking from the employer. In accordance with ss.191(1) and 201(3) of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 September 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 September 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517463 PR745934>
- AGLC
- Robert D Timms Pty Ltd T/A NT Powerlines and Electrical [2022] FWCA 3238
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3238
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the agreement's provisions to ensure it met the statutory requirements for minimum entitlements, such as the national minimum wage and other mandated conditions. It also scrutinised the flexibility provisions to confirm they aligned with the legal standards for allowing employees to request flexible working arrangements. Moreover, the court assessed whether the applicant had followed due process in negotiating and finalising the agreement with its employees. The court found that the agreement did not fully comply with the minimum entitlements section, as it failed to adequately address all required conditions. However, it did meet the standards for flexible working arrangements and procedural fairness.
Consequently, the court decided that while the agreement was largely compliant, certain sections regarding minimum entitlements needed rectification. The court directed the applicant to revise the agreement to include all mandatory conditions specified by the Fair Work Act 2009. Upon correction, the applicant was required to resubmit the agreement for final approval. The court's decision underscored the importance of comprehensive compliance with employment laws to protect employee rights and ensure fair working conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.