Road Transport Authority v Damien James Wade

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

DAMIAN JAMES WADE v MATTHEW JAMES WYNANTS and
ROAD TRANSPORT AUTHORITY v DAMIEN JAMES WADE
[2008] ACTSC 6 (5 February 2008)

CRIMINAL LAW – driving offences – sentencing

TRAFFIC LAW – licensing of drivers – criteria for authorising a restricted license – special and acceptable circumstances warranted issue of restricted license

TRAFFIC LAW – offences – particular offences – alcohol and drug related offences – level 3 PCA – good behaviour order with community service condition appropriate

MAGISTRATES – appeals from and control over magistrates – no error of law by magistrate

Magistrates Court Act 1930, s 216

Criminal Code Regulation 2005, Sch 1, Pt 1.1, Item 45

Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Regulation 2000, ss 47 and 48

Kent v Wilson [2000] VSC 98

R v Steggall (2005) A Crim R 402

Hammond v RTA [2006] ACTSC 125

ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

No. SCA 71 of 2007
No. SCA 76 of 2007

Judge:             Higgins CJ
Supreme Court of the ACT

Date:              5 February 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE       )
  )          No. SCA 71 of 2007
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY    )          No. SCA 76 of 2007

ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

BETWEEN:DAMIAN JAMES WADE

Appellant

AND:MATTHEW JAMES WYNANTS

Respondent

AND:

BETWEEN:ROAD TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

Appellant

AND:DAMIEN JAMES WADE

Respondent

ORDER

Judge:  Higgins CJ
Date:  5 February 2008
Place:  Canberra

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The appeal, SCA 71 of 2007, be dismissed.

  1. The appeal, SCA 76 of 2007, be dismissed.

  1. SCA71 of 2007 is an appeal against a sentence imposed on the appellant on 9 August 2007 by Magistrate Fryer.  He had entered a plea of guilty to two charges, namely:

That he … on 14 January 2007 did possess a drug of dependence, to wit, methylamphetamine

and

That he …  on 14 January 2007 did drive a motor vehicle on a public street with level three alcohol in his blood.

  1. There is also an appeal by the Road Transport Authority (RTA) (SCA 76 of 2007) against the grant by her Honour of authority to it to issue a restricted licence to drive a motor vehicle to the appellant.  To avoid confusion, Mr Wade will be referred to as “the appellant”.

  1. On the first charge her Honour recorded a conviction and sentenced the appellant to six months imprisonment, fully suspended, upon his signing an undertaking to comply with a good behaviour order for a period of two years (that is, until 8 August 2009).  Additional conditions were that the appellant (1) give security of $1000; (2) accept supervision of and obey reasonable directions from the Director (now Chief Executive) of Corrective Services; and (3) perform 200 hours of community service.

  1. On the second charge the appellant was sentenced to four months imprisonment, cumulative upon the previous sentence and also fully suspended upon a good behaviour order in the same terms as above.  His license to drive a motor vehicle was disqualified for 12 months (that…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Road Transport Authority v Damien James Wade and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] ACTSC 6
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Road Transport Authority v Damien James Wade involved the respondent, Damien James Wade, who was appealing against decisions made by the Chief Magistrate regarding his driving licence. The primary issue was whether the Chief Magistrate erred in upholding the decision of a Stipendiary Magistrate to grant Wade a restricted driving licence. Wade had previously been convicted of drink driving and was subject to a prohibition on driving for a period of three years. The second appeal pertained to the conditions of the restricted licence granted to Wade, specifically whether the condition imposed that he participate in a good behaviour order and community service was appropriate.

The court examined the criteria for authorising a restricted licence, which requires the presence of special and acceptable circumstances. The Court of Appeal held that the Chief Magistrate did not err in determining that such circumstances existed, thus justifying the issuance of a restricted licence to Wade. In considering the conditions attached to the restricted licence, the court found that the imposition of a good behaviour order with a condition for community service was an appropriate measure, given Wade's history of alcohol-related driving offences. The court also affirmed that the Chief Magistrate did not make any errors of law in the sentencing process.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals brought forth by Wade. The court upheld the decisions of the Chief Magistrate and the Stipendiary Magistrate, finding no legal errors in their assessments of the circumstances and conditions surrounding Wade's restricted driving licence. The appeals were dismissed, and the original decisions remained in effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal, SCA 71 of 2007, be dismissed.

2. The appeal, SCA 76 of 2007, be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.