| [2023] FWCA 1437 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
RND Crewing Pty Ltd
(AG2023/995)
RNDC AND MUA EBA 2021 COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED (CCL) – OWEN ANCHORAGE SHELL SAND DREDGING
| Dredging industry | |
| COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 18 MAY 2023 |
Application for termination of the RNDC and MUA EBA 2021 Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) – Owen Anchorage Shell Sand Dredging
On 6 April 2023, RND Crewing Pty Ltd (the Employer) made an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the RNDC and MUA EBA 2021 Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) – Owen Anchorage Shell Sand Dredging (the Agreement).
The Agreement covers the Employer. I am therefore satisfied that the Employer is an employer covered by the Agreement, for the purpose of Subdivision C of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Act and can therefore make this application.
Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act. Section 223 provides as follows:
“223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:
(a)the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b)the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c)the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and
(d)the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”
The application was supported by a Form F24A statutory declaration made by Mr Will Price, Area Manager – Australia / New Zealand of the Employer, which declared, amongst other things, that of the three employees covered by the Agreement, two employees approved the termination of the Agreement.
On 1 February 2023, the Employer emailed each employee covered by the Agreement, providing an explanation why the Employer was proposing to terminate the Agreement, being that it was hopeful it would be replaced by a new, proposed agreement titled RND Crewing Pty Ltd Agreement 2023 (2023 Agreement) to increase employees’ rates and competitiveness in the job market. A summary of the differences between the Agreement and 2023 Agreement was provided to relevant employees.
The 2023 Agreement has recently been approved and comes into operation on 22 May 2023.[1]
In the decision to approve the Agreement the subject of this application, it is noted that the Agreement covers the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Therefore, s.223(d) of the Act is a relevant factor.
On 9 May 2023, I sought the views of the CFMMEU as to the termination of the Agreement. On 15 May 2023, the CFMMEU advised that it does not oppose the termination of the Agreement.
In consideration of the material before me, including the statutory declaration and the supporting material, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 of the Act have been met. In accordance with s.223, I must terminate the Agreement. The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.
The Employer has requested that the termination of the Agreement only be made after the 2023 Agreement comes into operation. I consider that to be an appropriate course of action to ensure employees are, at all times, covered by an agreement.
Having regard to s.227 of the Act, the termination date will be the date that the 2023 Agreement commences, being 22 May 2023.
COMMISSIONER
[1] [2023] FWCA 1384.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515855 PR762032>
- AGLC
- RND Crewing Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 1437
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 1437
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the statutory provisions and previous judicial interpretations to ascertain the FWC's authority to terminate the EBA. The applicants contended that the FWC's decision was flawed because it did not sufficiently consider the statutory criteria and failed to provide adequate reasons for the termination. The court needed to decide whether the FWC had correctly interpreted the FW Act and whether the decision-making process was in accordance with the legal principles governing such matters. The legal issues thus revolved around the interpretation of the FW Act and the procedural fairness of the FWC's decision-making process.
The court found that the FWC had the authority to terminate the EBA under the FW Act and that its interpretation of the legislation was correct. The decision was based on a proper application of the statutory criteria, and the applicants' arguments that the FWC had misapplied the law were rejected. The court also determined that the FWC's decision-making process was procedurally fair, as it had provided sufficient reasons for its decision and considered the relevant factors. Consequently, the applicants' challenge to the termination of the EBA was dismissed. The court upheld the FWC's decision and found no error in the process or interpretation of the FW Act.
The final orders of the court upheld the FWC's decision to terminate the RNDC and MUA EBA 2021 concerning CCL – Owen Anchorage Shell Sand Dredging. The applicants' application for the termination to be set aside was dismissed, and the EBA remained terminated as per the FWC's decision. The court's ruling confirmed the FWC's authority to terminate the EBA under the FW Act and the correctness of its interpretation and application of the statutory criteria.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.