FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| RINSKY & RINSKY | [2008] FamCA 427 |
| FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – husband seeks summary dismissal of wife’s application pursuant to s 79A to set aside final property settlement orders made in 1998 – included order that the husband pay the wife an amount upon receipt of his superannuation entitlement, calculated pursuant to specified formula – whether husband’s retirement 4 days early resulted in any miscarriage of justice – whether miscarriage of justice due to husband’s failure to take lump sum which included a capital sum based upon husband foregoing any pension – final property orders made on basis husband would not capitalise all pension entitlement – pension taken into account at trial – whether court incorrectly made purported order for spousal maintenance under s 79 – reference to definition of “property” in 1998 – no reasonable cause of action – s 79A application “doomed to fail” – application for final orders summarily dismissed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79 & 79A Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 10.12 |
| Lindon v Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541 Bigg v Suzi (1998) FLC 92-799 Beck and Beck (2004) FLC 93-181 Gitane and Velacruz (2007) FLC 93-309 Goldman and Goldman [2007] FamCA 578 Korsky and Bright and Anor [2007] FamCA 245 T and T (Pension Splitting) (2007) FLC 93-263 |
| APPLICANT: | Mrs Rinsky (By her Case Guardian Ms M) |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Rinsky |
| FILE NUMBER: | ADC | 6404 | of | 2007 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 18 June 2008 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| PLACE HEARD: | Adelaide |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Dawe J |
| HEARING DATE: | 1 April 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | N/A |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Self-Represented Case Guardian – Mr M |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Richards |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Scales & Partners |
Orders
That the application of the wife filed on the 19 December 2007 for final orders be dismissed.
I will hear parties in relation to the application for costs.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Rinsky & Rinsky is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE |
FILE NUMBER: ADC 6404 of 2007
| Mrs Rinsky (By her Case Guardian Mr M) |
Applicant
And
| Mr Rinsky |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The husband seeks the summary dismissal of the wife’s application to set aside the final property settlement orders made at the conclusion of proceedings in 1998 and 1999.
Background and Chronology
The wife filed an Application for Final Orders on the 19 December 2007 in which she sought orders to set aside the order made at paragraph 1(d) of the final property settlement orders made by Judicial Registrar Forbes on the 24 December 1998. The wife sought other orders in relation to the husband’s superannuation. The orders sought are set out in the Final Orders Application (document 1) filed on the 19 December 2007:
“1.To set aside the order made at paragraph 1(d) of the original court order and make…
Continue reading Rinsky and Rinsky
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Rinsky and Rinsky [2008] FamCA 427
- Case
- [2008] FamCA 427
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application for final orders should be granted.
Dawe J dismissed the wife's application. The court indicated it would hear the parties in relation to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the application of the wife filed on the 19 December 2007 for final orders be dismissed.
2.
I will hear parties in relation to the application for costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.