Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rinehart v Rinehart [2020] NSWCA 221 Hearing dates: 23 and 24 July 2020 Date of orders: 22 September 2020 Decision date: 22 September 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1];
Macfarlan JA at [17];
Meagher JA at [57]Decision: (1) Notice of Appeal filed on 19 December 2019 dismissed.
(2) Summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 1 May 2020 dismissed.
(3) Order Bianca Rinehart to pay Gina Rinehart’s costs of these appeal proceedings.
Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – orders concerning interim indemnification of previous trustee for costs of delivery of trust documents to new trustee – whether orders final or interlocutory – orders expressly stated to be subject to any further order – exercise of discretion by primary judge in case management and the working out of earlier orders – no final determination of the issues by primary judge – no utility in granting leave to appeal
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(e)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 54.3
Cases Cited: Athens v Randwick City Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 58; [2005] NSWCA 317
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; [2001] HCA 63
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 17) [2011] FCA 1420; (2011) 286 ALR 346
AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police (2010) 78 NSWLR 302; [2010] NSWCA 81
Bruton Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 239 CLR 346; [2009] HCA 32
Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (2019) 93 ALJR 807; [2019] HCA 20
Doyle v Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 34
Glencore International AG v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2019) 265 CLR 646; [2019] HCA 26
Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 646
Hancock v Rinehart [2018] NSWSC 1684
In re Grimthorpe [1958] Ch 615
Klewer v Attorney General (NSW) [2010] NSWCA 219
Nolan v Collie (2003) 7 VR 287; [2003] VSCA 39
Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206
Re Beddoe [1893] 1 Ch 547
Rinehart v Rinehart [2019] HCASL 242
Rinehart v Rinehart [2019] NSWCA 54
Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (Cth) [2020] HCA 14; (2020) 94 ALJR 502
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bianca Hope Rinehart (Applicant)
Gina Hope Rinehart (First Respondent)
Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)
Hope Downs Iron Ore Pty Ltd (Third Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
D Thomas SC / D Hume (Applicant)
C N Bova SC / T E O’Brien / D J Reynolds (First Respondent)
J Giles SC / C Mitchell (Second and Third Respondents)
YPOL Lawyers (Applicant)
Speed & Stracey Lawyers (First Respondent)
Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Second and Third Respondents)
File Number(s): 2019/366237; 2020/133923 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 25 October 2019
- Before:
- Ward CJ in Eq
- File Number(s):
- 2011/285907
Judgment
-
BASTEN JA: I agree with…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Rinehart v Rinehart and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWCA 221
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary judge's orders were final or interlocutory in nature. This determination was crucial for assessing whether leave to appeal was required and, if so, whether it should be granted. The Court also considered the primary judge's exercise of discretion in managing the case and in working out earlier orders.
The Court of Appeal reasoned that the orders were not final because they were expressly made subject to any further order. The primary judge had not made a final determination of the issues, and there was no utility in granting leave to appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the notice of appeal filed on 19 December 2019 and the summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 1 May 2020. The Court further ordered Bianca Rinehart to pay Gina Rinehart’s costs of the appeal proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Notice of Appeal filed on 19 December 2019 dismissed.
(2) Summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 1 May 2020 dismissed.
(3) Order Bianca Rinehart to pay Gina Rinehart’s costs of these appeal proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.