Rilak and Tsocas (No 5)

In the matter of *Rilak and Tsocas (No 5)*, Loughnan J of the Federal Court of Australia considered an application for an adjournment of proceedings. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the fact that it had reached its fifth iteration, is not detailed in the provided text.

The sole legal issue before the court was whether to grant an oral application for an adjournment of the proceedings.

Loughnan J refused the oral application for an adjournment. No specific reasoning or legal principles applied in reaching this decision are provided in the text.

The court ordered that the oral application for an adjournment of proceedings be refused.