Rihani v Waverley Council

Link copied
Case Copied 22 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Rihani v Waverley Council [2022] NSWLEC 1292
Hearing dates: 4-5 May 2022
Date of orders: 6 June 2022
Decision date: 06 June 2022
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Walsh C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Development application DA-320/2021 for partial demolition of an existing two storey semi-detached dwelling and construction of an additional level and new hardstand car space, at 12 Narelle Street North Bondi, is determined by refusal of consent.

(3) The exhibits are returned except Exhibits 2, A and D which are retained.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – dwelling house ––floor space ratio contravention – streetscape character – weight to development control plan provisions

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012

Cases Cited:

Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118

Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council (2004) 136 LGERA 254; [2004] NSWLEC 472

Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827

Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; [2001] NSWCA 167

Texts Cited:

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy (December 2021)

Waverley Development Control Plan 2012

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Sophia Zara Rihani (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Gough (Solicitor) (Applicant)
C Rose (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Storey & Gough Lawyers (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/364892
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. This is an appeal under s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) against the refusal by Waverley Local Planning Panel of development application No DA-320/2021 for alterations and additions to a dwelling house at 12 Narelle Street, North Bondi (site).

Site and locality

  1. I rely on the Statement of Facts and Contentions (Ex 1) filed by the respondent, Waverley Council (Council), for much of the material in this and the following scene-setting sections.

  2. The site is identified as Lot 481 in DP 209061 and is located on the southern side of Narelle Street, between Polyblank Parade to the west and Reina Street to the east.

  3. The site is a rectangular shape with a northern frontage to Narelle Street and a southern rear boundary abutting 12 Stewart Street. The site has an area of 218m2 and falls from the north front boundary towards the south boundary by approximately 5m.

  4. The site is currently occupied by a one and two storey semi-detached dwelling with no vehicle access. The adjoining semi (ie “paired” with the dwelling on the site) has a street address of 10 Narelle Street. 10 Narelle Street has quite recently received approval for its own alterations and additions (referenced by the parties as DA-252/2021).

  5. The site is located in the R2 Low Density Residential zone under Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 (WLEP), as is the area generally surrounding the site.

  6. It is fair to describe Narelle Street as…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Rihani v Waverley Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWLEC 1292
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Rihani, the appellant, contested the Waverley Council’s refusal to grant consent for a development application concerning alterations to a property located at 12 Narelle Street North Bondi. The application, DA-320/2021, sought approval for the partial demolition of an existing two-storey semi-detached dwelling and the construction of an additional level along with a new hardstand car space. The primary issue before the court was whether the council’s decision to refuse consent was legally sound and whether there were any grounds for the appellant to appeal the decision successfully.

The court needed to determine if the Waverley Council’s decision was consistent with the relevant planning laws and whether the appellant had valid grounds to appeal. Specifically, the court examined whether the council had appropriately considered the planning principles and relevant zoning laws in making its decision. Additionally, the court assessed whether there were any procedural errors or omissions by the council that could have impacted the fairness of the decision-making process. The court also considered the appellant's arguments regarding the impact of the proposed development on the neighbourhood and compliance with local council policies.

The court found that the Waverley Council's decision to refuse consent was legally sound. It was determined that the council had appropriately applied the relevant planning laws and policies in reaching its decision. The court held that the appellant did not demonstrate that the council's decision was unreasonable or that there were procedural errors that warranted a reversal of the decision. The court found that the proposed development did not align with the neighbourhood’s character and did not comply with the local planning policies. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and upheld the council’s decision to refuse consent for the development application.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Development application DA-320/2021 for partial demolition of an existing two storey semi-detached dwelling and construction of an additional level and new hardstand car space, at 12 Narelle Street North Bondi, is determined by refusal of consent.

(3) The exhibits are returned except Exhibits 2, A and D which are retained.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.