Richardson and Older

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

RICHARDSON & OLDER [2008] FamCA 43
FAMILY LAW – CHILD SUPPORT – Appeal – s105 of the Child Support (Assessment Act) 1989 – principles applicable to leave
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Child Support (Assessment Act) 1989 (Cth)
APPLICANT: Mr Richardson
RESPONDENT: Ms Older
FILE NUMBER: NCC 2211 of 2001
DATE DELIVERED: 15 January 2008
PLACE DELIVERED: Newcastle
PLACE HEARD: Newcastle
JUDGMENT OF: Justice Fowler
HEARING DATE: 14 January 2008

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Drake
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Nash

Orders

  1. The father is granted leave to appeal from the decision of Magistrate Railton made on 19 June 2007.

  2. The appeal is fixed for hearing at 9.30 am on Friday, 28 March 2008 before Justice Fowler in the Newcastle Registry.

  3. Both parties are to file and serve any material by way of fresh evidence in support of their case on or before Friday, 14 March 2008

IT IS NOTED IN CONNECTION WITH THESE ORDERS that the judgment of the Honourable Justice Fowler delivered this day will for all publication and reporting purposes be referred to as Richardson & Older.

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: NCC 2211 of 2001

MR RICHARDSON

Applicant

And

MS OLDER

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The matter before the court is an application for leave to appeal from the decision of Magistrate Railton made on 19 June 2007 dismissing the application brought by the father.

  2. That application sought the overturning of a decision of the Child Support Registrar with respect to the child support payable for the two children of his relationship with the mother.  Those children are a son born in December 1992 and a daughter born in October 1997.

  3. In January 2006 following an application made by the mother, the decision of the Child Support Registrar which adjusted the income of the father on which child support for the two children was determined was objected to by the father and his objection disallowed by the Child Support Registrar.

  4. The appeal is brought pursuant to the provisions of Section 105 of the Child Support Act which provides that an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of a State to the Family Court.

  5. Such appeal under Section 105(2) can only be brought with the leave of the court.

  6. Section 105(6) provides that the appeal if leave is granted is to proceed by way of a hearing de novo but the Court may receive as evidence any record of evidence given in the matter, any affidavit filed or exhibit received in the court of summary jurisdiction.

  7. This judgment relates only to the question of whether leave should be granted.

  8. The Act is not of much assistance in identifying the matters that should be taken into account on an application for such leave.  The judgments of the Full Court on leave to appeal on questions of law do not seem to be particularly helpful since the result of leave in this case will…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Richardson and Older and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] FamCA 43
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Richardson and Older*, heard before Justice Fowler, the father sought leave to appeal a decision made by Magistrate Railton on 19 June 2007. The precise nature of the dispute before the Magistrate is not detailed in the provided text, but the father's application for leave to appeal indicates a disagreement with the original determination.

The primary legal issue before Justice Fowler was whether to grant the father leave to appeal the Magistrate's decision. The court was also required to determine the procedural steps necessary for the appeal, including the timeline for filing and serving any fresh evidence.

Justice Fowler granted the father leave to appeal. The court then set a date for the hearing of the appeal, which was scheduled for Friday, 28 March 2008, at 9:30 am in the Newcastle Registry. Furthermore, a deadline of Friday, 14 March 2008, was imposed for both parties to file and serve any fresh evidence they intended to rely upon in support of their respective cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The father is granted leave to appeal from the decision of Magistrate Railton made on 19 June 2007.

2.

The appeal is fixed for hearing at 9.30 am on Friday, 28 March 2008 before Justice Fowler in the Newcastle Registry.

3.

Both parties are to file and serve any material by way of fresh evidence in support of their case on or before Friday, 14 March 2008

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.