Rheem Australia Pty Ltd T/A Rheem

Case

[2017] FWCA 425

20 JANUARY 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2017] FWCA 425
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Rheem Australia Pty Ltd T/A Rheem
(AG2016/7323)

RHEEM RYDALMERE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 20 JANUARY 2017

Application for approval of the Rheem Rydalmere Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Rheem Rydalmere Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Rheem Australia Pty Ltd T/A Rheem. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), Australian Workers’ Union and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 20 January 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 January 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 September 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE423090  PR589561>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0